首页> 外文学位 >A helping hand?: The United States, 'Questions of the Far East,' & the Washington Conference, 1921--1922.
【24h】

A helping hand?: The United States, 'Questions of the Far East,' & the Washington Conference, 1921--1922.

机译:伸出援手?:美国,《远东问题》,华盛顿会议,1921--1922年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

By examining in detail the conference records as well as a variety of personal collections and writings, this dissertation investigates the U.S. role at the Washington Conference, 1921-22, specifically the forgotten aspects of the "Questions of the Far East." Historians have traditionally focused on the Five-Power Treaty (limitation of naval armaments) or the Four-Power Treaty (alliance in East Asia). So prominent has been this focus that some scholars have contended that the conference produced a so-called Washington system, which replaced the existing imperialist system and defined East Asian relations throughout the 1920s. Yet, the conference also produced the Nine-Power Treaty and related resolutions, which reflected such significant issues as the Open Door, tariff autonomy, railway control, and extraterritoriality. This study seeks to examine these too-often overlooked issues and to highlight the central question of who would control China---the Chinese or the foreigners.;Although this study examines Japanese, Chinese, and British policy, it concentrates on U.S. actions. Believing itself to be uniquely dedicated to China's interests, American policymakers approached the Washington Conference as an occasion to enhance China's position and distinguish U.S. policy further from old world imperialism by expanding the Open Door doctrine. Yet, when the opportunity arose at Washington to grant China greater rights, the United States failed to back its rhetoric. Instead, America engaged in the balance-of-power politics that it claimed to despise, rather than extending the "helping hand" it professed to be offering. Not only did the conference fail to construct a Washington system, but the United States and the Powers maintained the status quo of imperialism, albeit a cooperative imperialism in China.
机译:通过详细检查会议记录以及各种个人收藏和著作,本论文研究了美国在1921-22年华盛顿会议上的角色,尤其是“远东问题”中被遗忘的方面。历史学家传统上将重点放在《五国条约》(限制海军军备)或《四国条约》(东亚联盟)上。这种关注如此突出,以至于一些学者争辩说,这次会议产生了所谓的华盛顿体系,该体系取代了现有的帝国主义体系,并在整个1920年代确定了东亚关系。然而,会议还产生了《九国条约》及相关决议,反映了诸如门户开放,关税自主,铁路控制和域外性等重大问题。这项研究旨在研究这些经常被忽视的问题,并突出显示谁将控制中国的核心问题-中国人还是外国人。尽管该研究研究了日本,中国和英国的政策,但它集中于美国的行动。美国决策者们相信自己将致力于中国的利益,因此在华盛顿会议上借机扩大了“开放门”理论,以增强中国的立场,并使美国的政策与旧世界的帝国主义进一步区别开来。但是,当华盛顿出现机会授予中国更多权利时,美国却没有支持其言论。相反,美国参与了它自称鄙视的均势政治,而不是伸出它自称提供的“援助之手”。会议不仅没有建立华盛顿体系,而且美国和大国都维持了帝国主义的现状,尽管在中国是合作的帝国主义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Buck, David R.;

  • 作者单位

    West Virginia University.;

  • 授予单位 West Virginia University.;
  • 学科 History United States.;Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 315 p.
  • 总页数 315
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 美洲史;国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号