首页> 外文学位 >The historicization of globalization: Dynamics of change in Eurasia sur la 'longue duree'.
【24h】

The historicization of globalization: Dynamics of change in Eurasia sur la 'longue duree'.

机译:全球化的历史性化:欧亚大陆“长期”变化的动态。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Human communities formed to pool resources, to join forces to fight organic entropy. Grouping required an informational framework provided by status. Status determined the level of access to energy, the level of organic dis-entropy achieved. Since status is not fixed by natural laws, human social action is a manifestation of status-seeking behavior.; Status established order, but inequality pushed order toward entropy. The result is an ongoing dialectic between social dynamism and conservatism. All order is embedded in social institutions, that are both material structures and ideal systems, and that range in format from the nuclear family to the most complex imperial civilization. Social institutions are the channel for status-seeking action. They combat entropy through the exercise of power, both material and ideal.; If individual and collective behaviors are unitary, the energy necessary to combat organic and social entropy is rare. Institutions of social order have been pitted against each other competing for resources. Scarcity resulted in systemic conflict between communities, civilizations, etc. The intensity of competition stratified functioning hierarchies, and reified the distinguishing traits and unique social patterns that evolved through institutionalization.; However, individuals could affiliate with multiple institutions and bear multiple identities. Their interest was in the diversification of access to systems of status and, through it, the diversification of resources made available to them. Crisscrossing allegiances across institutional lines fed currents of diffusion. The result was imperfectly homogeneous societies, exposed to an ongoing process of globalization.; The two dialectics of status-achievement and resource-acquisition presided over the evolution of pre-modern societies. Social dynamics were not cyclical, but evolutionary, even though evolution was repeatedly halted by severe episodes of breakdown. The observation of a number of cases in Eurasia reveals that most societies underwent similar evolutionary processes under the influence of global dynamics of change. The driving force behind social evolution was secular demographic growth, and the associated phenomena of urbanization, division of labor, and exchange.
机译:人类共同体聚集起来以聚集资源,联合起来对抗有机熵。分组需要状态提供的信息框架。状态决定了获得能量的程度,达到的有机熵的程度。由于地位不是自然法则所确定的,因此人类的社会行为是寻求身份行为的体现。状态建立了顺序,但不平等推动顺序趋向于熵。结果是社会活力与保守主义之间不断进行辩证。所有秩序都嵌入社会机构中,它们既是物质结构又是理想的系统,其格式范围从核心家庭到最复杂的帝国文明。社会机构是寻求地位行动的渠道。它们通过物质和理想力量的行使来对抗熵。如果个人和集体行为是统一的,那么对抗有机和社会熵所必需的能量就很少了。社会秩序制度相互竞争,争夺资源。稀缺性导致了社区,文明等之间的系统性冲突。竞争的激烈程度将功能等级分层,并通过制度化发展来区分鲜明的特征和独特的社会模式。但是,个人可以隶属于多个机构并具有多个身份。他们的兴趣是使获得地位系统的方式多样化,并通过这种方式使向他们提供的资源多样化。跨机构线的交叉效忠为扩散提供了潮流。结果是社会不完全统一,暴露于持续的全球化进程中。地位获得和资源获取的两种辩证法主导着前现代社会的发展。社会动态不是周期性的,而是进化的,尽管进化因严重的崩溃事件而屡屡停止。对欧亚大陆许多案例的观察表明,大多数社会在全球变化动态的影响下经历了相似的进化过程。社会进化的推动力是长期的人口增长,以及相关的城市化,分工和交换现象。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pecastaing, Camille.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 History General.; History European.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 395 p.
  • 总页数 395
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界史;欧洲史;世界史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号