首页> 外文学位 >Domesticating 'the Great, Throbbing, Common Pulse of America': A Study of the Ideological Origins of the Radio Act of 1927.
【24h】

Domesticating 'the Great, Throbbing, Common Pulse of America': A Study of the Ideological Origins of the Radio Act of 1927.

机译:驯化“美国的伟大,Th动,共同的脉搏”:1927年《无线电法》的思想渊源研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The stated purposes of the Commerce Department's national radio conferences in the 1920s were simple enough: end signal interference and resolve airwave congestion. This dissertation argues that the preoccupation with the concepts of interference and congestion among advocates of what eventually became the 1927 Radio Act were part of a more general reaction among policy elites and intellectuals to the industrial, technological, and demographic changes that had been unsettling economic, political, and cultural conventions in the United States for decades. Judicial opinions, legal briefs, speeches, films, and articles in trade and general interest magazines, newspapers, and scholarly journals in the years and decades before passage of the Radio Act strongly suggest that reformers, policy elites, and intellectuals wanted above all to mediate the transition to modernity. They did not simply want to find an administrative fix for interference and appease the Radio Trust, as most of the studies on the Act assert. Reformers also believed that broadcasting presented a cultural problem as much as or more than an economic or engineering one. Interference and congestion, this dissertation argues, were salient metaphors for anxieties that also manifest themselves, for example, in the contemporaneous debates about immigration, urbanization, mechanization, and the general role government administration in democracy. Seen in this light, the Radio Act of 1927 was only part of a larger reform effort against modernity itself.
机译:美国商务部在1920年代召开的全国无线电会议上所陈述的目的非常简单:终止信号干扰并解决无线电波拥塞。本文认为,最终成为1927年《无线电法》的拥护者对干扰和拥塞概念的关注,是政策精英和知识分子对工业,技术和人口变化做出的更普遍反应的一部分,这些变化已经使经济不安,美国数十年来的政治和文化公约。在《无线电法》通过之前的数十年中,贸易和一般利益杂志,报纸和学术期刊上的司法意见,法律摘要,演讲,电影和文章均强烈建议改革者,政策精英和知识分子首先要进行调解向现代的过渡。正如有关该法案的大多数研究所断言的那样,他们并不仅仅是想找到一种管理上的干扰解决方案并安抚无线电信托。改革者还认为,广播带来的文化问题比经济或工程问题多或多。本文认为,干扰和拥挤是焦虑症的重要隐喻,例如在关于移民,城市化,机械化以及政府管理在民主中的一般​​作用的同时辩论中也表现出了焦虑。从这个角度看,1927年的《无线电法》只是反对现代性本身的更大改革努力的一部分。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sylvain, Olivier.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 History United States.;Mass Communications.;Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 259 p.
  • 总页数 259
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号