首页> 外文学位 >Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation systems and applications for climate change policy analysis.
【24h】

Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation systems and applications for climate change policy analysis.

机译:发电系统的生命周期评估及其在气候变化政策分析中的应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This research uses Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) to better understand the energy and environmental performance for two electricity generation systems, a 620 MW combined-cycle natural gas plant, and an 8kW building-integrated photovoltaic system. The results of the LCA are used to provide an effective and accurate means for evaluating greenhouse gas emission reduction strategies for U.S. electricity generation.; The modern combined-cycle plant considered in this thesis is nominally 48% thermally efficient, but it is only 43% energy efficient when evaluated across its entire life-cycle, due primarily to energy losses during the natural gas fuel cycle. The emission rate for the combined-cycle natural gas plant life-cycle (469 tonnes CO2-equivalent per GWeh), was 23% higher than the emission rate from plant operation alone (382 tonnes CO2-equivalent per GWeh). Uncertainty in the rate of fuel-cycle methane releases results in a potential range of emission rates between 457 to 534 tonnes CO 2-equivalent per GWeh for the studied plant.; The photovoltaic system modules have a sunlight to DC electricity conversion efficiency of 5.7%. However, the system's sunlight to AC electricity conversion efficiency is 4.3%, when accounting for life-cycle energy inputs, as well as losses due to system wiring, AC inversion, and module degradation. The LCA illustrates that the PV system has a low, but not zero, life-cycle greenhouse gas emission rate of 39 Tonnes CO2-equivalent per GWeh.; A ternary method of evaluation is used to evaluate three greenhouse gas mitigation alternatives: (1) fuel-switching from coal to natural gas for Kyoto-based compliance, (2) fuel-switching from coal to nuclear/renewable for Kyoto based compliance, and (3) fuel-switching to meet the White House House's Global Climate Change Initiative. In a moderate growth scenario, fuel-switching from coal to natural gas fails to meet a Kyoto-based emission target, while fuel-switching to nuclear/renewable meets the emission objective by reducing coal generated electricity 32% below 2000 levels. The Global Climate Change Initiative allows annual greenhouse gas emissions to increase to levels that are 54% higher than the proposed U.S. commitment under the Kyoto Protocol.
机译:这项研究使用生命周期评估(LCA)来更好地了解两个发电系统,一个620 MW联合循环天然气电厂和一个8kW建筑物集成光伏系统的能源和环境绩效。 LCA的结果可为评估美国发电的温室气体减排策略提供有效而准确的手段。本文中考虑的现代联合循环电厂名义上的热效率为48%,但在其整个生命周期中进行评估时,其能源效率仅为43%,这主要是由于天然气燃料循环期间的能量损失。联合循环天然气工厂生命周期的排放率(每GWeh 469吨CO 2 当量)比仅工厂运营的排放率(382吨CO 2 -等效每GW e h)。燃料循环甲烷释放速率的不确定性导致所研究工厂的潜在排放速率范围为每GW h 457至534吨CO 2 -当量。 ;光伏系统模块的阳光到直流电转换效率为5.7%。但是,考虑到生命周期的能量输入以及由于系统接线,交流逆变和模块降级而引起的损耗,该系统的阳光到交流电的转换效率为4.3%。 LCA表明,光伏系统的生命周期温室气体排放率低,但不为零,每GW e 相当于39吨CO 2 。一种三元评估方法用于评估三种减少温室气体排放的替代方法:(1)为实现《京都议定书》所规定的从煤到天然气的燃料转换;(2)为实现《京都议定书》所规定的从煤到核/可再生燃料的燃料转换;以及(3)转换燃料以满足白宫的全球气候变化倡议。在温和增长的情况下,从煤炭到天然气的燃料转换无法达到基于京都议定书的排放目标,而将燃料转换为核能/可再生能源则通过将煤炭发电量降低2000%以下32%达到了排放目标。全球气候变化倡议允许每年的温室气体排放量增加到比美国根据《京都议定书》提出的承诺高出54%的水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号