首页> 外文学位 >Scientific methods: American fiction and the professionalization of medicine, 1880--1940.
【24h】

Scientific methods: American fiction and the professionalization of medicine, 1880--1940.

机译:科学方法:美国小说和医学专业化,1880--1940年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

During the second half of the nineteenth century, the medical profession in America began to transform itself from a motley group of practitioners---registering remarkably disparate levels of education, expertise, and credibility---into a cohesive and exclusive body, enjoying ever-increasing status and income and solidifying what social historians have termed their "professional sovereignty" within the larger culture. The concomitant appearance of numerous novels and stories preoccupied with the figure and the business of the doctor suggests that these texts from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries not only documented but also intervened in the professionalization of medicine. Scientific Methods juxtaposes literary texts with non-literary documents and with material culture in order to determine the nature and the extent of these interventions and to delineate competing narratives within the history of medicine.;By interrogating a range of professional performances represented in American fiction between 1880 and 1940, Scientific Methods establishes a complementary narrative to accounts of medical professionalization constructed by social historians. Although social historians have managed to destabilize the master narratives of scientific progress elaborated by the physician-historians of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, their investigations into the history of professionalization still center on physicians in conflict with each other and in thrall to science and technology, neglecting public perceptions of the professionalization process. Literary representations of this process, on the other hand, chart the ways in which popular understandings of the figure and the business of the physician arose and circulated, elucidating points of accord and disparity between professional ideologies and lived experience and exposing the dynamics of power between doctors and patients. These fictions of medical professionalization both reflected and produced beliefs; thus they stand as essential tools for understanding the consolidation of authority around doctors. In addition, I utilize a diverse range of archival materials---from hospital records to WPA posters---to complicate my readings of these fictional engagements with the professionalization process and to illuminate the relationship of literature to other cultural domains.;I argue that this textual sequence recasts the pursuit of professionalism and the gradual consolidation of cultural authority around doctors as a constant tension between the discipline of self---as the popularity of nineteenth-century "conduct books" for physicians demonstrates---and the discipline of Others. Lacking pervasive cultural authority at the end of the nineteenth century, doctors concentrated upon cultivating professional identity through professional "pantomimes" that simultaneously demonstrated their mastery of specialized knowledge and of middle-class social norms. Eventually, these professional "pantomimes" migrated from the stage of community practice to the arena of eminently consumable, ubiquitous popular entertainments such as radio programs and public art. This movement coordinates with an increasing amount of cultural authority and a decreasing need for individual self-discipline within the profession, and with doctors---a group overwhelmingly white, middle-class, and male---feeling freer than ever to visit spectacular and invasive violence upon the raced, class, and gendered bodies of Others. These disciplinary measures include the exclusion or removal of nonwhite male and white female practitioners from the medical profession, elaborated in Frank Norris's McTeague; human experimentation by the single-minded "microbe hunters" on southern populations during the interwar period, romanticized in Sinclair Lewis's Arrowsmith ; and eugenic pressure exerted on poor women by the Depression-era discourses of public health, critiqued by Tillie Olsen's Yonnondio and Meridel LeSueur's The Girl. Yet far from reflecting an idealized vision of the medical professional, replete with cultural authority, these narrations of disciplinary events reveal doctors threatened by incursions by nonwhite and female practitioners, defeated by their own experimental protocols, and agitated by the unlimited reproduction of the working class.
机译:在19世纪下半叶,美国的医学界开始从一群杂乱无章的从业者转变为具有凝聚力和排他性的机构,这些人从教育,专业知识和信誉的各个方面都获得了显着的进步。 -在更大的文化中提高地位和收入,并巩固社会历史学家所说的“专业主权”。伴随着人物和医生业务而出现的许多小说和故事的相伴出现,表明这些十九世纪末至二十世纪初的文本不仅有文献记载,而且干预了医学的专业化。 《科学方法》将文学文本与非文学文献以及物质文化并列在一起,以便确定这些干预措施的性质和程度,并在医学史上描述竞争性叙事。通过询问美国小说中表现出的一系列专业表现, 1880年和1940年,《科学方法》建立了由社会历史学家构建的医学专业化报告的补充叙述。尽管社会历史学家设法破坏了19世纪和20世纪医师历史学家所阐述的科学进步的主要叙述的稳定性,但是他们对专业化历史的研究仍然集中在医师之间相互冲突并且对科学技术产生了深深的兴趣,忽视公众对专业化过程的看法。另一方面,该过程的文学表现形式描绘了人们对人物和医生业务的普遍理解并传播的方式,阐明了专业意识形态和生活经验之间的一致与差距,并揭示了两者之间的动力关系。医生和病人。这些医疗专业化的小说既反映又产生了信念。因此,它们是理解医生权威的必不可少的工具。此外,我使用了各种各样的档案材料-从医院记录到WPA海报-使我对这些虚构作品的阅读与专业化过程复杂化,并阐明了文学与其他文化领域的关系。该文本序列重塑了对专业精神的追求以及围绕医生的文化权威的逐步巩固,这是自我学科之间的持续紧张关系(如19世纪医师对《行为指南》的普及所证明的)以及该学科别人的。在19世纪末,由于缺乏普遍的文化权威,医生专注于通过专业的“哑剧”来培养专业身份,而专业的“哑剧”则同时显示了他们对专业知识和中产阶级社会规范的掌握。最终,这些专业的“哑剧”从社区实践的阶段迁移到了诸如电视节目和公共艺术之类的易消耗,无处不在的流行娱乐场所。这种运动与越来越多的文化权威和对专业内个人自律的需求减少,以及与医生(一群绝大多数是白人,中产阶级和男性)的需求相适应,比以往任何时候都更加自由自在以及对他人的种族,阶级和性别的身体施加的侵略性暴力。这些纪律措施包括弗兰克·诺里斯(Frank Norris)的《麦克蒂格(McTeague)》详细阐述的将非白人男性和白人女性从业者排除在医疗行业之外的做法;一心一意的“微生物猎手”在两次大战之间对南方人群进行的实验,在辛克莱·刘易斯的《阿罗史密斯》中浪漫化;蒂利·奥尔森(Tillie Olsen)的扬农迪奥(Yonnondio)和梅里德尔·勒苏尔(Meridel LeSueur)的《女孩》(The Girl)批评说,大萧条时期的公共卫生言论对贫困妇女施加了优生压力。这些纪律事件的叙述并没有反映出医务人员的理想化理想,而是充满了文化权威,而这些纪律事件的叙述却揭示了医生受到非白人和女性从业人员入侵的威胁,被自己的实验方案打败,并被工人阶级的无限繁殖所鼓动。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hall, Deidre Dallas.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.;
  • 学科 American Studies.;Literature American.;History of Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 204 p.
  • 总页数 204
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号