首页> 外文学位 >Cooperation and asymmetric interdependence: The Bundesbank, currency markets and the European quest for mutual accommodation, 1959--1999.
【24h】

Cooperation and asymmetric interdependence: The Bundesbank, currency markets and the European quest for mutual accommodation, 1959--1999.

机译:合作与不对称相互依存:1959--1999年,德国央行,货币市场和欧洲寻求相互适应的努力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The puzzle. For the last decade, the political economy literature on Germany's role in the history of European monetary unification focused on the Bundesbank's ascent to the “Bank that ruled Europe” and asked how Germany's central bank had managed to leave its mark on the continent. However, with the inception of the Euro and its immediate internal and external softening, it became quickly evident that EMU hardly carries the mark of the Bundesbank but represents a German concession to France and Italy. The implicit puzzle is whether we can reconcile the key role played by the Bundesbank in European monetary integration with the fact that the outcome was above all a German concession. This dissertation puts forward an answer.; The argument. This dissertation contends that the governments of Europe moved to EMU because Bundesbank independence became incompatible with their quest for mutual adjustment and accommodation. Indeed, as long as the Bundesbank was independent, it had the structural capacity to resist adjustment and to foreclose Options for cooperation that were incompatible with its domestic preferences. This structural power was the basis of the Bundesbank's ability to assert far-reaching influence over the historical course of monetary integration. Though Bundesbank policies contributed to a generally desirable process of European disinflation, the French and Italian governments evaluated the Bundesbank's unwillingness to agree to more symmetrical adjustment procedures as unacceptable—particularly after they had deflated. Over the issue of reunification, the German government conceded EMU to accommodate French and Italian grievances with an independent Bundesbank and thus delivered the adjustment they sought. The process of European adjustment became mutual at the point where Maastricht was fully implemented and the Bundesbank was retired in 1999. The case of European monetary integration, I argue, supports theories that understand cooperation as resulting from a mutual willingness of states to accommodate each other and from a mutual convergence of state preferences.; The method. This dissertation uses the comparative case method to analyze policy choices in Germany, France and Italy.
机译:拼图。在过去的十年中,有关德国在欧洲货币统一史上的作用的政治经济学文献着眼于德国联邦银行升格为“统治欧洲的银行”,并询问德国中央银行如何在欧洲大陆上留下自己的烙印。然而,随着欧元的诞生以及其内部和外部的立即软化,人们很快发现,动车组几乎没有德国央行的标志,而是德国对法国和意大利的让步。隐含的难题是,我们是否可以调和联邦银行在欧洲货币一体化中发挥的关键作用,其结果首先是德国的让步。本文提出了一个答案。 参数。本文认为,欧洲政府之所以选择欧洲货币联盟,是因为德国联邦银行的独立性与他们寻求相互调整和调和的要求格格不入。的确,只要德国央行是独立的,它就具有抵抗调整和取消与其国内偏好不符的合作选择的结构能力。这种结构性力量是德国央行在货币整合的历史过程中主张深远影响的能力的基础。尽管德国央行的政策助长了欧洲普遍认为的通货紧缩进程,但法国和意大利政府认为德国央行不愿同意更对称的调整程序是不可接受的,尤其是在通缩之后。在统一问题上,德国政府让欧洲货币联盟(EMU)向独立的德国央行(Bundesbank)接纳法国和意大利的不满,从而实现了他们寻求的调整。在马斯特里赫特(Maastricht)全面实施且联邦银行(Bundesbank)于1999年退休之时,欧洲的调整过程成为共同的过程。我认为,欧洲货币一体化的案例支持理解理论的理解,即国家之间相互适应的共同意愿导致了合作。以及国家偏好的相互融合。 方法。本文采用比较案例法来分析德国,法国和意大利的政策选择。

著录项

  • 作者

    White, Colin Jeffrey.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.; Economics General.; History European.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 448 p.
  • 总页数 448
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;经济学;欧洲史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号