首页> 外文学位 >Interrogating the limits of bourgeois radical dissent: Nationalist discourse in the literature of the Bengal famine of 1943.
【24h】

Interrogating the limits of bourgeois radical dissent: Nationalist discourse in the literature of the Bengal famine of 1943.

机译:质疑资产阶级激进异议的限度:1943年孟加拉饥荒文学中的民族主义话语。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Informed by debates in Welfare and Development Economics surrounding Amartya Sen's radical shift in the theorization of famine as a failure in exchange entitlements rather than a failure in the availability of food, and given the location of the Bengal famine of 1943 at such a critical juncture in India's nationalist history when it was on the cusp of independence, this dissertation foregrounds the intimate nexus between unifying anti-colonial nationalist discourses and inequitable class relations as a primary aspect of the uneven social costs of famine which constitute an insistent focus of representation in Bengal famine literature. Women and peasants come to occupy a particularly conflicted space in the intersecting discourses of nationalism and famine in the literature of the Bengal famine given the politically volatile and affective context of the decolonizing rhetoric of the times, and especially in light of the fact that Bengal has always been at the forefront of the nationalist movement in India, and was troubled by widespread peasant movements and labor unrest in the 1930s and 1940s. The striking ambivalence that characterizes Bengal famine texts is symptomatic of the ideological uneasiness of bourgeois/bhadralok radical discourse which is torn between a documentary compulsion to record the famine in all its grimness and horror, and a compensatory visionary, and indeed, distractionary imperative, animated by the unifying logic of a hegemonic nationalist discourse that underplays all conflicts stemming from inequalities of class, caste, gender, religion and region in the promise of an egalitarian postcolonial Indian state that will be organized on principles of social justice and tolerance.; My literary archive consists largely of texts that can be seen as written in the tradition of social protest literature: Krishan Chandar's "Anna-Data," Tarashankar Bandhopadhyay's Manwantar, Ela Sen's Darkening Days, Bijan Bhattacharya's Nabanna, Manik Bandhopadhyay's stories of famine and the Tebhaga movement, and Bhabani Bhattacharya's two novels of famine, among others written in the immediate context of the famine; I also explore post-independent representations of the Bengal famine in films by Satyajit Ray and Mrinal Sen respectively, and of famine in the work of Mahasweta Devi.
机译:在福利和发展经济学的辩论中,围绕阿玛蒂亚·森(Amartya Sen)的饥荒理论发生了根本性转变,因为这是交换权利的失败,而不是粮食供应的失败,并考虑到1943年孟加拉饥荒的发生在这样一个紧要关头。在印度处于独立的风口浪尖的民族主义历史上,本文提出了统一的反殖民民族主义话语和不平等的阶级关系之间的密切联系,这是饥荒社会成本不均的主要方面,构成了饥荒的代表焦点文献。鉴于当时非殖民化言论的政治动荡和情感背景,尤其是考虑到孟加拉国具有以下事实,在孟加拉国饥荒的文学中,妇女和农民在民族主义和饥荒的相交论述中占据了特别矛盾的空间一直处于印度民族主义运动的最前沿,并在1930年代和1940年代受到广泛的农民运动和劳工动荡的困扰。孟加拉饥荒文本所表现出的鲜明矛盾性是资产阶级/ baddralok激进话语在意识形态上的不安的征兆,在纪录片强迫症中记录了饥荒的所有残酷和恐怖,以及补偿性的有远见的,甚至是分散注意力的,迫切需要的,生气勃勃的霸权民族主义话语的统一逻辑,低估了阶级,种姓,性别,宗教和地区不平等引起的所有冲突,并承诺建立一个平等的后殖民印度国家,将根据社会正义和宽容原则进行组织。我的文学档案主要由可以看作是社会抗议文学传统的文字组成:克里山·钱达尔(Krishan Chandar)的“安娜·数据(Anna-Data)”,塔拉山卡·班德霍帕德(Tarashankar Bandhopadhyay)的曼万塔尔(Manwantar),埃拉·森(Ela Sen)的《黑暗的日子》(Darkening Days),比安·巴塔察亚(Bijan Bhattacharya)的纳巴纳(Nabanna),曼尼基·班多帕德帕(Manik Bandhopadhyay)的饥荒故事和特巴哈加(Tebhaga)故事。运动,以及巴巴尼·巴塔查里亚的两部饥荒小说,其中包括紧接饥荒的小说;我还将探讨萨蒂亚吉特·雷(Satyajit Ray)和Mrinal Sen分别在电影中对孟加拉饥荒的独立报道,以及马哈斯韦塔·德维(Mahasweta Devi)的饥荒的独立报道。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kaur, Rajender.;

  • 作者单位

    Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.;

  • 授予单位 Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.;
  • 学科 Literature Asian.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 310 p.
  • 总页数 310
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 I3;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号