首页> 外文学位 >The role of the psyche in social analysis: An examination of texts by Sigmund Freud, Max Weber, Theodor Adorno and Norbert Elias.
【24h】

The role of the psyche in social analysis: An examination of texts by Sigmund Freud, Max Weber, Theodor Adorno and Norbert Elias.

机译:心理在社会分析中的作用:西格蒙德·弗洛伊德(Sigmund Freud),马克斯·韦伯(Max Weber),西奥多·阿多诺(Theodor Adorno)和诺伯特·埃里亚斯(Norbert Elias)对文本的考察。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This work examines social scientific texts that integrate two spheres of human reality: psyche and social. It examines these texts closely, seeking to discover not only what they say theoretically about the psycho-social interconnect, but also how they depict it analytically. It seeks thereby to uncover the underlying conceptual paradigms by which each of the works structure its representations of this interconnect. The texts are by four seminal thinkers rooted in a common German intellectual tradition: Sigmund Freud, Max Weber, Theodor Adorno and Norbert Elias.; Sigmund Freud's two major books on civilization contain radically different paradigms of the relationship of society and psyche. In The Future of an Illusion, society is a prior social facticity that represses, sublimates and distributes instinctual energies. In Civilization and its Discontents, society is in itself the embodiment of these energies.; Max Weber's The Protestant Ethic utilizes a model of social action in which irrational psychological states mediat between culture and social action. Weber's methodological writings argue that analysis should differentiate rational from irrational elements of action and interpret the latter by methods of verstehen psychology.; The psycho-social paradigm of Theodor Adorno's writings on fascist psychology posits a dialectical interaction between determinant social structures and psychic responses. Adorno insists on recognition of the primacy of social structure in this interaction, but in reality he focuses on psychic response.; Norbert Elias's work so interlocks psyche and social that a paradigm emerges in which the two are aspects of the same historical processes. For instance, Elias's concept of Fremdzwang ("the pressures which people exert on one another") refers to both social structure and the psyche's experience of social structure. And his concept of the civilizing process refers to parallel developments of social and psychic differentiation.; Following the examination of texts structured by these various psycho-social paradigms, a conclusion considers the ways they, and the theories and analyses they structure, relate not only to each other, but also offer possible assistance to those of who today wish to advance an understanding of the psychological qualities inherent in much of social reality.
机译:这项工作研究了将人类现实的两个领域融为一体的社会科学文本:心理和社会。它仔细研究了这些文本,不仅试图发现它们在理论上对心理-社会联系的看法,而且还发现它们如何进行分析性描述。因此,它试图揭示潜在的概念范式,通过这些范式,每部作品都可以构造其对这种互连的表示。这些文本是由四个具有开创性的思想家植根于德国共同的知识传统中的:西格蒙德·弗洛伊德,马克斯·韦伯,西奥多·阿多诺和诺伯特·埃里亚斯。西格蒙德·弗洛伊德(Sigmund Freud)的两本关于文明的主要著作包含了社会与心理关系的根本不同范例。在“幻象的未来”中,社会是压制,升华和分配本能的先验社会事实。在文明及其不满中,社会本身就是这些能量的体现。马克斯·韦伯(Max Weber)的“新教伦理”利用一种社会行为模型,在这种模型中,非理性的心理状态在文化与社会行为之间进行调节。韦伯的方法论著作认为,分析应将理性与非理性的行动要素区分开来,并通过Verstehen心理学的方法对其进行解释。西奥多·阿多诺(Theodor Adorno)关于法西斯心理学的著作的社会心理范式在决定性社会结构与心理反应之间建立了辩证互动。阿多诺坚持在这种互动中承认社会结构的首要地位,但实际上他专注于心理反应。诺伯特·埃里亚斯(Norbert Elias)的作品将心理和社会联系在一起,以至于出现了一个范例,其中两者是同一历史过程的各个方面。例如,埃里亚斯的“弗雷姆宗(Freddzwang)”概念(“人们相互施加的压力”)既指社会结构,也指心理学家对社会结构的体验。他的文明过程概念指的是社会和心理分化的并行发展。在研究了由各种社会心理范式构成的文本之后,结论得出了结论,即不仅考虑了它们之间的联系方式,而且理论和分析的结构相互联系,也为今天希望进一步发展的人们提供了可能的帮助。了解社会现实中固有的心理素质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号