首页> 外文学位 >Using biomarkers to assess the accuracy of dietary assessment methodologies.
【24h】

Using biomarkers to assess the accuracy of dietary assessment methodologies.

机译:使用生物标记物评估饮食评估方法的准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Research in nutritional epidemiology seeks to understand relationships between diet and disease. Error in dietary assessment can lead to an underestimation of disease risk or false conclusions regarding diet and disease relationships. Improving the accuracy of dietary methodologies for capture of habitual dietary intake in large study populations can increase the understanding and interpretation of results from epidemiological studies.; An extensive review of studies where dietary intake was determined by self-report while energy expenditure was measured simultaneously by doubly labeled water (DLW) demonstrated a potential for reporting error. Among 23 studies evaluated, energy intake was under reported on average by 20%, but all studies involved small, select populations.; To test dietary instruments in a large, general population, we collaborated with the National Cancer Institute on the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. This study used DLW and urinary nitrogen as biomarkers to examine bias in the reporting of total energy and protein intake. Energy intake was under reported in this study by 16 ± 6% on the diet recall and by 35 ± 5% on the diet history questionnaire.; The validity of a single measurement of energy expenditure as representative of an individual's average expenditure has been questioned. To study the reliability of DLW measurements, a repeat measurement was obtained in a subset of OPEN participants. The coefficient of variation of the DLW energy expenditure method was 5.1% demonstrating that it is a precise measure of energy expenditure.; The under reporting of energy intake on dietary surveys could result from either generalized portion size errors or the underreporting of specific foods. To distinguish between these sources of error, the accuracy of reported meat intake was assessed using a biomarker of meat intake, urinary 3-methylhistidine (3-MH). Compared to accurate reporters of energy intake, under-reporters misreported their true meat intake resulting in a weakened association between reported intake and urinary 3-MH excretion. Moreover, under-reporters of energy intake under reported meat intake in proportion to their under-reporting of calorie intake. This finding supports the use of energy adjusted intake values in studies exploring the relationship between meat intake and disease.
机译:营养流行病学研究旨在了解饮食与疾病之间的关系。饮食评估中的错误会导致疾病风险的低估或关于饮食与疾病关系的错误结论。提高在大型研究人群中捕获习惯性饮食摄入量的饮食方法的准确性,可以增加对流行病学研究结果的理解和解释。一项广泛的研究回顾表明,饮食摄入是通过自我报告来确定的,而能量消耗是用双标签水(DLW)同时测量的,这表明有可能报告错误。在评估的23项研究中,平均能量摄入不足20%,但所有研究均涉及少数特定人群。为了在庞大的普通人群中测试饮食工具,我们与美国国家癌症研究所合作开展了蛋白质和能量营养观察研究。这项研究使用DLW和尿液氮作为生物标志物来检验总能量和蛋白质摄入量报告中的偏倚。在这项研究中,能量摄入在饮食召回中报告为16±6%,在饮食历史问卷中报告为35±5%。有人质疑以能源支出为代表的个人平均支出的单一度量的有效性。为了研究DLW测量的可靠性,在OPEN参与者的子集中获得了重复测量。 DLW能量消耗方法的变异系数为5.1%,表明它是能量消耗的精确度量。饮食调查中能量摄入不足的报告可能是由于普遍的份量大小错误或特定食物的报告不足所致。为了区分这些错误来源,使用肉类摄入生物标志物尿中的3-甲基组氨酸(3-MH)评估了报告的肉类摄入的准确性。与准确的能量摄入报告者相比,报道不足的人错误地报告了其真实的肉类摄入量,从而导致所报告的摄入量与尿中3-MH排泄之间的联系减弱。此外,在报告的肉类摄入量之下,能量摄入不足的报告者与他们的卡路里摄入不足的报告成比例。这一发现支持在研究肉类摄入量与疾病之间关系的研究中使用能量调整后的摄入量值。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Nutrition.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 129 p.
  • 总页数 129
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号