首页> 外文学位 >The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award process in public higher education institutions and effects on organizational performance: A historical perspective.
【24h】

The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award process in public higher education institutions and effects on organizational performance: A historical perspective.

机译:公立高等教育机构的马尔科姆·鲍德里奇(Malcolm Baldrige)国家质量奖程序及其对组织绩效的影响:历史观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Public undergraduate higher education institutions face a number of seemingly intractable problems. Among those problems are cost, accountability and access. The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award process is designed to help organization of any type address problems of organizational performance. This process has been used by manufacturing, healthcare, and educational institutions among others. The purpose of this study was to explore performance differences between award recipients and non-recipients on measures related to these three challenges in public higher education.;Two major research questions were postulated, and tested using historical data. The first questions asked if award recipients performed better than non-recipients against measures related to these three challenges at the time of the award. The second question asked if the rate of change in this performance was different for award recipients and non-recipients in the time period leading up to the award.;A theoretical framework was proposed, composed of the three challenges as constructs. Each construct was associated with multiple measures. The first question was tested using MANCOVA procedures to test the theoretical framework. Each construct was then tested with the same procedure. Finally, univariate results were analyzed for each of the 12 dependent variables. The same model and levels of analysis applied to the second question using repeated measures MANCOVA.;Significant differences at alpha .05 were found for several spending variables, minority success, and for two year institutions, graduation rates. Support for the theoretical framework as a whole was not found. However, it was also concluded that award recipients performed better on some measures where management actions had a direct effect such as cost. Accountability measures were affected indirectly by management actions, and the results for this construct were more mixed. Finally, it was concluded that access was not responsive to management solutions, and may be more strongly affected by public policy.
机译:公立本科高等教育机构面临许多看似棘手的问题。这些问题包括成本,问责制和获取。 Malcolm Baldrige国家质量奖程序旨在帮助任何类型的组织解决组织绩效问题。制造,医疗保健和教育机构等已使用此过程。这项研究的目的是探讨与公立高等教育中这三个挑战有关的措施在获奖者和非获奖者之间的表现差异。假定两个主要研究问题,并使用历史数据进行检验。第一个问题是,在授予奖项时,针对这三个挑战的措施,获奖者是否比非获奖者表现更好。第二个问题是,在获得奖励的时期内,获奖者和非获奖者的表现变化率是否不同。;提出了一个理论框架,由三个挑战构成。每个构造都与多个度量相关联。使用MANCOVA程序测试了第一个问题,以测试理论框架。然后以相同的程序测试每个构建体。最后,对12个因变量中的每一个进行单变量结果分析。使用重复测量的MANCOVA,将相同的模型和分析水平应用于第二个问题;在几个支出变量,少数族裔成功率和两年制机构的毕业率中,发现alpha值在.05上存在显着差异。找不到对整个理论框架的支持。但是,还得出结论,在某些直接影响管理行动(例如成本)的措施上,获奖者的表现更好。问责措施受到管理措施的间接影响,而此构造的结果则更加复杂。最后,得出的结论是访问对管理解决方案没有响应,并且可能会受到公共政策的更大影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bailey, Bill D.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana State University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana State University.;
  • 学科 Education Higher Education Administration.;Business Administration Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 191 p.
  • 总页数 191
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:26

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号