首页> 外文学位 >Assessment of water quality impacts for different management practices using SWAT model.
【24h】

Assessment of water quality impacts for different management practices using SWAT model.

机译:使用SWAT模型评估不同管理实践对水质的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The high yield input strategy has been successful in narrowing the gap between food and fiber requirements and the growing population. However, at the same time it has also threatened the sustainability of land and water resources. Best management practices (BMPs) are technically feasible methods for preventing or reducing nonpoint source pollution to a level compatible with water quality goals. Long-term monitoring of BMP impacts is essential to assess their effectiveness under different conditions. However, it is impractical to monitor all BMPs under all conditions due to time and cost constraints. Computer simulation models provide an alternative to evaluate the response of soil and crops to a range of management practices in an efficient and cost effective way. Testing and evaluation of computer models require the use of extensive field data to ensure that they are reliable for the prediction of management effects. This study was designed to: (1) Calibrate and evaluate the subsurface drainage component of SWAT model; (2) Test the ability of SWAT (version 99.2) model for predicting nitrate-nitrogen (N03N) losses with tile flow, by comparing the model output versus measured data; (3) Application of SWAT model on watershed scale.; In general, SWAT adequately tracked the measured tile drain flows, except that the cumulative monthly tile flows were consistently under-predicted. Differences of -8.4 to 6 and 2 to 11% were determined for the annual simulated tile flows as compared to the corresponding measured flows for the calibration and validation period respectively. Calibration of SWAT was performed using tile flow NO3-N loss data measured in 1995 while validation was conducted by comparing the model output with measured NO3-N losses with tile flow observed in 1993--94 and 1996--97. Differences ranging from 2 to 10% and -7.34 to 5.50 were found between annual NO 3-N losses during the calibration period and validation period respectively, indicating that the model tracked the monthly observations reasonably well. However, the peak NO3-N losses were consistently under-predicted for all three combinations of tillage and cropping systems.; The SWAT model was used to estimate the flow and nitrate loading for UMRW watershed. The model was calibrated for stream flow and NO3-N data measured in 1999 at the outlet of the watershed and model was validated for 2000 and 2001 period. The model accurately tracked most of the peak flow events that occurred during the year, although the peaks were usually over predicted. The model tracked the flow reasonably well but model was unable to track the nitrate trend. The underprediction between the simulated and measured annual flow for year 1999 was 24%, while 35% for year 2000 and 12% for year 2001. The NO3-N was over predicted by 25%, 22% and 108% for 1999, 2000, and 2001, indicating the poor performance of SWAT model in NO3-N simulation.
机译:高产投入策略已成功地缩小了粮食和纤维需求与不断增长的人口之间的差距。然而,与此同时,它也威胁着土地和水资源的可持续性。最佳管理规范(BMPs)是在技术上可行的方法,用于将非点源污染预防或减少到与水质目标相适应的水平。 BMP影响的长期监测对于评估不同条件下的有效性至关重要。但是,由于时间和成本的限制,在所有条件下监视所有BMP是不切实际的。计算机模拟模型提供了一种替代方法,可以以有效且经济高效的方式评估土壤和农作物对一系列管理实践的响应。计算机模型的测试和评估需要使用大量的现场数据,以确保它们对于预测管理效果是可靠的。本研究旨在:(1)校准和评估SWAT模型的地下排水组件; (2)通过比较模型输出与实测数据,测试SWAT(99.2版)模型预测砖流中硝酸盐氮(N03N)损失的能力; (3)SWAT模型在流域尺度上的应用。通常,SWAT可以充分跟踪所测得的瓷砖排水流量,但累积的每月瓷砖流量始终被低估。确定的年度模拟瓷砖流量与校准和验证期间相应的测量流量相比,分别确定了-8.4%至6%和2%至11%的差异。通过使用1995年测得的砖瓦流动NO3-N损失数据对SWAT进行校准,同时通过将模型输出与1993--94年和1996--97年观测到的瓦斯流动与测量的NO3-N损失进行比较来进行验证。在校准期间和验证期间,每年的NO 3-N损失之间的差异分别为2%至10%和-7.34至5.50,这表明该模型较好地跟踪了每月观测值。然而,对于耕作和耕作系统的所有三种组合,NO3-N峰值损失始终被低估。 SWAT模型用于估算UMRW流域的流量和硝酸盐负荷。对该模型进行了标定,以分析流域和1999年在流域出口处测得的NO3-N数据,并对该模型进行了2000年和2001年的验证。该模型准确地跟踪了一年中发生的大多数峰值流量事件,尽管这些峰值通常被过度预测。该模型可以很好地跟踪流量,但是无法跟踪硝酸盐趋势。 1999年模拟和测量的年流量之间的低估为24%,而2000年为35%,2001年为12%。1999、2000年,NO3-N被高估了25%,22%和108%,和2001年,表明SWAT模型在NO3-N模拟中的性能较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号