首页> 外文学位 >The Ming gap and shipwreck ceramics in Southeast Asia (China, Thailand, Vietnam).
【24h】

The Ming gap and shipwreck ceramics in Southeast Asia (China, Thailand, Vietnam).

机译:东南亚(中国,泰国,越南)的明代间隙和沉船陶瓷。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation uses shipwreck archaeological materials in Southeast Asia to discover the extent of trade ceramics shortages from China in the early Ming period and to describe the Southeast Asian ceramics that take their place. Firstly, some 120 maritime sites are organized into an approximate relative chronology. The chronology is shown on 24 tables that cover the years from the first centuries AD to the 20th century. The analysis then focuses on 15 sites that cover the period circa 1368--1487. These sites reveal two types of shortages. Once Thai and Vietnamese ceramics join shipwreck cargoes in the Hongwu reign (1368--98) or very shortly thereafter, there is not a single shipwreck with 100% Chinese ware until the 16th century. On shipwrecks from circa 1368--1430 the percentage of Chinese ware, which comprises primarily celadon and brown glazed wares, is 30--40%. On ships from approximately 1430--1487, the percentage of Chinese ceramics drops to 2% and usually less, and then in the Hongzhi (1488--1505) reign the percentage abruptly rises to about 90%. The Ming gap, a term that refers to a near absence of Chinese blue and white ware, runs from about 1352 through to the beginning of the Hongzhi reign when Chinese ware, including a large proportion of blue and white, floods onto the Southeast Asian market. Only one to three blue and white Chinese pieces are documented on shipwrecks from circa 1352--1450, and about a hundred examples are known for the years circa 1450--1487. Many thousands fill the shipwrecks from the Hongzhi reign. Besides finding evidence for shortages of Chinese ceramics, the research reveals, for the first time, a six-phase chronology for Thai ceramics. This chronology covers the late 14th to late 16th centuries. Vietnamese ceramics are divided into two major phases, circa 1368--1430 and circa 1450--1510. The abrupt disappearance of Vietnamese ware after about 1510 until about 1600 is here dubbed the 'Mac (dynasty) gap.' The ships also show evidence for the export of Central Vietnam Champa ceramics circa 1450--1475, and for Burmese ceramics circa 1470--1510. They also suggest minor shortages of Chinese ware in the middle 16th century circa 1520--1560/70 when the only Southeast Asian exports came from Thailand.
机译:本文利用东南亚的沉船考古材料,发现明初中国贸易陶瓷短缺的程度,并描述了取代东南亚的陶瓷。首先,将大约120个海事站点组织成一个近似的相对时间顺序。年表显示在24个表格上,涵盖了从公元前几个世纪到20世纪的年份。然后,分析集中于15个地点,涵盖了大约1368--1487年的时期。这些站点显示出两种类型的短缺。一旦泰国和越南的陶瓷在洪武元年(1368--98)或之后不久加入海难货物,直到16世纪,再也没有一个100%的中国瓷器沉船。在大约1368--1430年的沉船残骸中,中国商品的比例为30--40%,主要包括青瓷和棕色琉璃。在大约1430年至-1487年的船上,中国陶瓷的比例下降到2%甚至更低,然后在洪志(1488--1505)统治时期,该比例突然上升到90%左右。明代鸿沟(Ming差距)是指几乎没有中国的青花瓷器,从1352年一直持续到洪志统治初期,当时包括大部份青花瓷器的中国瓷器涌入东南亚市场。 。在大约1352--1450年的沉船中,只有一到三件青花瓷作品被记录下来,而在1450--1487年间,大约有一百个例子被发现。洪志统治时期沉船残骸成千上万。该研究除发现中国陶瓷短缺的证据外,还首次揭示了泰国陶瓷的六阶段年表。此编年史涵盖了14世纪末到16世纪末。越南陶瓷分为两个主要阶段,大约1368--1430和大约1450--1510。大约1510年到1600年左右,越南商品突然消失,在这里被称为“ Mac(王朝)鸿沟”。这些船还显示了大约1450--1475年越南中部尚帕陶瓷出口以及大约1470--1510年缅甸陶瓷出口的证据。他们还暗示,在16世纪中叶,大约1520--1560 / 70年代中国商品严重短缺,当时唯一的东南亚出口来自泰国。

著录项

  • 作者

    Brown, Roxanna Maude.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 Art History.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 241 p.
  • 总页数 241
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 艺术史、艺术思想史;世界史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号