首页> 外文学位 >Parties in Conflict: Domestic Politics, Dispute Settlement, and International Trade.
【24h】

Parties in Conflict: Domestic Politics, Dispute Settlement, and International Trade.

机译:冲突各方:国内政治,争端解决和国际贸易。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To what extent do countries cooperate or compete in their relations with one another? Specifically, why do democratic states launch international trade disputes choosing potentially costly arbitration of trade practices pertaining to a certain product or sector, when they could settle at lower cost "out-of-court"? This dissertation posits that Right-leaning and Left-leaning governments have different trade policy preferences and make systematically different decisions about whether to initiate, settle, and resolve international trade disputes. I find that partisan politics plays a role in the decision to initiate trade disputes, even in an age of globalization, with Right governments launching more export-oriented disputes. While Left governments launch fewer disputes, they are more contentious when they do. Partisanship also affects trade dispute resolution and compliance, with Left-leaning governments being less likely to comply. The decision to initiate or not initiate, and the decision to comply or not comply with adverse rulings on trade disputes will be affected by domestic pressures and institutions, including who wins and who loses if the decision is implemented, the locus of decision-making necessary to comply, and the overall structure of government. Advanced industrialized governments make systematically different decisions, based on partisan alignments toward dispute initiation and settlement. A formal model of WTO implementation and compliance is posited, which predicts that when left-leaning parties, those who tend to favor protection for domestic labor and markets, control government, compliance rates tend to fall. In contrast, right-leaning defendants, those who weigh highly market access and returns to capital, should be more willing to comply with adverse WTO rulings. These hypotheses are tested using data from WTO trade disputes involving twenty-five advanced industrialized countries and the European Union from 1970-2000.
机译:各国在何种程度上相互合作或竞争?特别是,为什么民主国家可以以较低的成本“庭外”解决,而选择与某产品或部门相关的贸易惯例进行潜在的昂贵仲裁,从而引发国际贸易争端?本文认为,右倾政府和左倾政府对贸易政策的偏好不同,对于是否发起,解决和解决国际贸易争端有系统的决定。我发现,即使在全球化时代,游击党政府在发起贸易争端的决定中也发挥着作用,右翼政府发起了更多面向出口的争端。尽管左翼政府发起的争端较少,但当它们发起争端时,它们的争议更大。党派关系还影响贸易争端的解决和合规,左倾政府合规的可能性较小。发起或不发起的决定以及是否遵守贸易争端的不利裁决的决定将受到国内压力和机构的影响,包括如果执行该决定,谁将是赢家,谁是输家,以及决策的必要位置。遵守政府的整体架构。先进的工业化政府基于对争议的发起和解决的党派一致作出系统上不同的决定。建立了世贸组织执行和遵守的正式模型,该模型预测,当倾向于左倾政党时,那些倾向于倾向于保护家庭劳动力和市场,控制政府的政党,遵守率往往会下降。相反,那些权衡市场准入和资本回报率的右倾被告,应该更愿意遵守不利的WTO裁决。这些假设使用来自1970-2000年间涉及25个先进工业化国家和欧盟的WTO贸易争端的数据进行了检验。

著录项

  • 作者

    Widsten, Amy L.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 261 p.
  • 总页数 261
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号