首页> 外文学位 >Beer wars: A theoretical examination of the epistemic community in the Canada-United States trade disputes on beer.
【24h】

Beer wars: A theoretical examination of the epistemic community in the Canada-United States trade disputes on beer.

机译:啤酒大战:对加拿大和美国啤酒贸易争端中的认知界的理论考察。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation seeks to assess whether the concept of epistemic communities provides a useful supplement to a statist explanation of events that occurred in the Canada-US beer wars. The Canada-US beer dispute began in the latter half of the 1980s and ended with the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding between Ottawa and Washington in 1993.; A review of the literature on Canadian foreign policy reveals that if theory is deployed at all in the literature, it tends to be the statist perspective. The position of this dissertation is that while the statist perspective tells analysts a great deal about how Canada's foreign policy decisions are ultimately derived, people and ideas are important determinants in this area of decision-making as well.; Such an approach hazards a number of formidable ontological, epistemological and methodological barriers that lie at the core of the 'inter-paradigm' debate in the literature on international relations. To help overcome some of these hurdles, this dissertation employs an approach characterized in international relations literature as methodological pluralism.; The statist focus on rational calculations of material interests is advanced as the null hypothesis in this examination. Should the null hypothesis prove inadequate to explain events, it will be supplemented by two further hypotheses designed to test the efficacy of an epistemic communities' explanation. These hypotheses are, first, that an epistemic community comprised of trade officials from Canada's Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade and the Office of the United States Trade Representative was operating during this dispute; and second, this epistemic community had a determinative impact on the dispute's outcome.; Following a brief examination of the brewing industries' development in Canada and the United States, as well as the regulatory practices of both countries, the hypotheses are deployed to examine the events of the disputes launched, first by the European Economic Community, and then, the US, under the trade dispute settlement provisions of the GATT, over the commercial practices of Canada's provincial liquor boards.; The dissertation concludes that the epistemic community was a key driver of events when it was permitted the 'political space' by elected officials.
机译:本文旨在评估认知社区的概念是否为统计学家解释加美啤酒战争中发生的事件提供了有用的补充。加美啤酒之争始于1980年代后半期,以1993年在渥太华和华盛顿之间签署谅解备忘录而告终。回顾有关加拿大外交政策的文献后发现,如果理论在所有文献中都得到运用,那往往是统计学家的观点。本文的立场是,尽管统计学家的观点告诉分析师很多有关加拿大外交政策决定如何最终产生的观点,但人和思想也是该领域决策的重要决定因素。这种方法危害了许多强大的本体论,认识论和方法论上的障碍,这些障碍是国际关系文献中“范式间”辩论的核心。为了克服这些障碍,本文采用国际关系文学中以方法论多元化为特征的方法。统计学家将重点放在物质利益的合理计算上,作为本次检验的原假设。如果原假设不足以解释事件,则将通过两个另外的假设进行补充,这些假设旨在测试认知社区的解释的有效性。这些假设是,首先,在这场争端期间,一个由加拿大外交和国际贸易部贸易官员和美国贸易代表办公室组成的知识界正在运作;其次,这个认知社区对争端的结果具有决定性的影响。在简要考察了加拿大和美国的酿造业发展以及两国的监管做法之后,首先将这些假设用于审查由欧洲经济共同体发起的纠纷事件,然后,美国根据关贸总协定的贸易争端解决规定,就加拿大省级酒类委员会的商业惯例进行了规定。论文得出的结论是,当民选官员将其作为“政治空间”时,认知社区是事件的主要驱动力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bricker, Calvin Lee.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Alberta (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Alberta (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 215 p.
  • 总页数 215
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号