首页> 外文学位 >The interaction of acoustic and linguistic aids to sentence intelligibility.
【24h】

The interaction of acoustic and linguistic aids to sentence intelligibility.

机译:声学和语言辅助手段的相互作用有助于句子的清晰度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

One of the earliest explanations for good speech intelligibility in poor listening situations was context (Miller, Heise & Lichten, 1951). Context was thought to allow listeners to group and predict speech appropriately and is known as a “top-down” listening process. Amplitude comodulation is another mechanism that has been shown to improve sentence intelligibility. More recently, amplitude comodulation was shown to provide acoustic grouping information without changing the linguistic content of the desired signal (Carrell & Opie, 1992). The use of amplitude comodulation in this way is considered a bottom-up process. The present experiment investigated how amplitude comodulation and semantic information combined to improve speech intelligibility. The sentence material used in these experiments accounted for any a priori probability of correct recognition (Boothroyd & Nittrouer, 1988). Experiment I examined the influence of semantic information and amplitude comodulation on amplitude degraded speech, and frequency degraded speech. Semantic information did not benefit listeners for either type of sentence. This result contrasted with results of an examination of semantic information on sentence presented in noise. Amplitude comodulation was found to aid listeners' ability to extract speech from amplitude degraded sentences but hindered their ability with frequency degraded sentences. The results obtained in Experiment I led to the questions: Were listeners not able to use semantic information due to the extremely low intelligibility of signals in Experiment I? Did the type of acoustic degrading processes used interfere with listeners' abilities to access semantic information? Experiment II examined these questions and revealed that semantic information aided listeners when speech was degraded with noise and intelligibility decreased as signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) decreased. Furthermore, −9 dB SNR produced comparable intelligibility levels for the low-predictability sentences as were found in low-predictability degraded amplitude and degraded frequency sentences; however, unlike the results from the degraded sentences, semantic information was found to improve listener intelligibility for the −9 dB SNR sentences. Although further research must be conducted to support this claim, the results of the present work support the notion that auditory object formation is likely to be a process that is separate from and occurs prior to speech perception.
机译:对于在不良聆听情况下良好的语音清晰度,最早的解释之一是语境(Miller,Heise和Lichten,1951年)。人们认为上下文可以使听众适当地分组和预测语音,这被称为“自上而下”的聆听过程。幅度共调制是另一种提高句子清晰度的机制。最近,显示幅度共调制可提供声学分组信息,而无需更改所需信号的语言内容(Carrell&Opie,1992)。以这种方式使用幅度协调制被认为是自下而上的过程。本实验研究了幅度共调制和语义信息如何组合以提高语音清晰度。这些实验中使用的句子材料说明正确识别的任何先验可能性(Boothroyd&Nittrouer,1988)。实验一检验了语义信息和幅度协调制对幅度退化语音和频率退化语音的影响。语义信息对这两种类型的句子都不利于听众。该结果与检查在噪声中呈现的句子的语义信息的结果形成对比。发现幅度共调制有助于听众从幅度降低的句子中提取语音的能力,但阻碍了听众对频率降低的句子的表达能力。实验一获得的结果引发了一个问题:由于实验一中信号的清晰度极低,听众是否无法使用语义信息?所使用的声音降解过程的类型是否会干扰听众访问语义信息的能力?实验II研究了这些问题,并发现当语音因噪声而降级且清晰度随信噪比(SNR)降低而降低时,语义信息有助于听众。此外,对于低可预测性语句,−9 dB SNR产生了可比的可理解度,正如在低可预测性降级幅度和降频语句中所发现的那样;但是,与降级语句的结果不同,发现语义信息可以提高-9 dB SNR语句的收听者清晰度。尽管必须进行进一步的研究以支持该主张,但是本工作的结果支持了这样的观念,即听觉对象的形成可能是与语音感知分离并发生在语音感知之前的过程。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shapley, Kathy Lynn.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Speech Pathology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 131 p.
  • 总页数 131
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号