首页> 外文学位 >Profile Attractiveness in Borderline Class III Surgical/Orthodontic Cases .
【24h】

Profile Attractiveness in Borderline Class III Surgical/Orthodontic Cases .

机译:边缘Ⅲ类外科/正畸病例的轮廓吸引力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction: This study evaluated differences between laypersons and orthodontists in rating facial attractiveness in borderline class III surgical/orthodontic cases. The purpose was to determine whether orthognathic surgery or camouflage is a better alternative for observable esthetic improvement in borderline Class III surgical/orthodontic patients. This study will aid the orthodontist in recommending treatment options to enhance profile attractiveness of borderline Class III surgical/orthodontic patients.;Materials and Methods: Thirty profile images of treated borderline class III surgical/ orthodontic cases were selected. Fifteen of the profile images were of cases that had been treated by orthodontics alone, and fifteen images were of cases that had been treated by a combination of orthodontics and surgery. Profile images were modified in Photoshop to mask the face and eyes.;Patients selected for this study: 1) were 16-25 years of age, 2) had a half-step or more Class III molar relationship, 3) had a pretreatment ANB greater than -4° and less than 1°, and 4) had a Wits appraisal less than -1.5mm and greater than -4mm. Patients with craniofacial anomalies and skin conditions were excluded from this study. Two groups of thirty raters evaluated the profile images for facial attractiveness by marking a 10 cm visual analog scale. One group of raters was composed of thirty orthodontists and the other group was composed of thirty laypersons. In order to evaluate intra-individual reproducibility of the measuring system, ten duplicate sets of profile images were added to the series.;Results: The repeated measures ANOVA F-test results found a statistically significant difference between facial attractiveness scores (p = 0.000), with higher ratings by orthodontists. There was no statistically significant difference between treatment type (p = 0.278). Intraclass correlation results indicate excellent reliability. The ICC was 0.774 (95% CI; 0.733, 0.808). The level of significance was set at &agr; = .05.;Conclusions: In evaluating facial attractiveness of borderline Class III surgical/ orthodontic cases, laypersons are more critical than orthodontists. Furthermore, surgery or camouflage treatment provides similar esthetic improvement in profile attractiveness in borderline class III surgical/orthodontic patients.
机译:简介:这项研究评估了三级临界外科/正畸病例中外行者与正畸医生在面部吸引力评级方面的差异。目的是确定正颌外科手术或伪装术是否可更好地替代边缘性III类外科/正畸患者的可观察到的美学改善。这项研究将帮助正畸医生推荐治疗方案,以增强III级边缘性外科/正畸患者的轮廓吸引力。;材料和方法:选择30例边缘性III类外科/正畸患者的轮廓图像。其中有15张图像是仅通过正畸治疗的病例,而15张图像是通过正畸与手术相结合的病例。在Photoshop中修改了个人资料图像以遮盖脸部和眼睛。此项研究选择的患者:1)16至25岁,2)半步或更高III级磨牙关系,3)进行过ANB预处理大于-4°且小于1°,并且4)的Wits评估小于-1.5mm且大于-4mm。有颅面畸形和皮肤状况的患者被排除在本研究之外。两组,由三十名评估者通过标记10厘米的视觉模拟标尺来评估轮廓图像的面部吸引力。一组评估者由三十名正畸医生组成,另一组由三十名非专业人士组成。为了评估该测量系统的个体内部可重复性,向该系列中添加了十组重复的轮廓图像。结果:重复测量的ANOVA F测试结果发现面部吸引力得分之间存在统计学上的显着差异(p = 0.000) ,牙齿矫正医生的评分更高。治疗类型之间无统计学差异(p = 0.278)。类内相关结果表明了极好的可靠性。 ICC为0.774(95%CI; 0.733,0.808)。重要性级别设置为&agr; = .05 。;结论:在评估边缘性III类外科/正畸病例的面部吸引力时,非专业人员比正畸医生更为重要。此外,外科手术或伪装治疗在边缘性III类外科/正畸患者中提供了类似的审美吸引力,从而改善了轮廓吸引力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Adamian, Melina.;

  • 作者单位

    Loma Linda University.;

  • 授予单位 Loma Linda University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Dentistry.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 85 p.
  • 总页数 85
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号