首页> 外文学位 >Community reinvestment after financial modernization an analysis of small business lending.
【24h】

Community reinvestment after financial modernization an analysis of small business lending.

机译:金融现代化后的社区再投资,对小企业贷款的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper examines whether or not community reinvestment, in the form of small business lending as required by the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), in low to moderate income (LMI) communities significantly improved in the years following the enactment of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) of 1999. Throughout the years, the CRA has undergone several regulatory changes designed to strengthen the evaluation process of financial institutions covered by the Act. These changes to the CRA such as those provisions created by the GLBA provide a great opportunity to evaluate the impact of the CRA post and pre-regulatory changes. Researchers have primarily focused on comparing the lending activity of CRA-covered and non-covered financial institutions in order to evaluate the impact of the CRA. Few researchers have focused on the impact of policy changes on improving the effectiveness of the CRA. Using a cross-sectional and panel analysis of CRA small business loan data I compare loan activity in the years prior to GLBA (1997-1999) and after GLBA (2000-2004). The results of my analysis indicate that contrary to my hypothesis, after the passage of the GLBA, LMI communities did not experience a statistically significant increase in lending. There are several limitations in interpreting these results related to data and controls available. Despite this, these results may indicate a need to redesign the CRA to keep pace with the evolving financial services industry and needs of LMI communities.
机译:本文研究了根据《格拉姆-里奇法案》颁布后的几年中,社区再投资是否按照《社区再投资法案》(CRA)的要求以小企业贷款的形式在中低收入(LMI)社区中得到了显着改善。 1999年的Bliley法案(GLBA)。多年来,CRA经历了一些监管变更,旨在加强该法案涵盖的金融机构的评估过程。对CRA的这些更改(例如GLBA制定的规定)为评估CRA岗位和监管前更改的影响提供了绝佳的机会。为了评估CRA的影响,研究人员主要集中在比较CRA覆盖的金融机构和未覆盖的金融机构的贷款活动。很少有研究者关注政策变化对提高CRA有效性的影响。通过对CRA小企业贷款数据的横截面和面板分析,我比较了GLBA之前(1997-1999)和GLBA(2000-2004)之后几年的贷款活动。我的分析结果表明,与我的假设相反,在GLBA通过之后,LMI社区的贷款没有统计学上的显着增加。在解释与可用数据和控件有关的这些结果时,存在一些限制。尽管如此,这些结果可能表明需要重新设计CRA,以跟上不断发展的金融服务行业和LMI社区的需求。

著录项

  • 作者

    Antwi, Bridgit.;

  • 作者单位

    Georgetown University.;

  • 授予单位 Georgetown University.;
  • 学科 Sociology Public and Social Welfare.
  • 学位 M.P.P.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 50 p.
  • 总页数 50
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号