首页> 外文学位 >Evidence-based decisions in differentiating normal from dysphonic adults.
【24h】

Evidence-based decisions in differentiating normal from dysphonic adults.

机译:以证据为基础的决策,以区分正常人与发音困难的成年人。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Voice clinicians use a variety of measures to diagnose dysphonia, including the clinical interview, a perceptual/listening assessment, analysis of the acoustic and aerodynamic properties of the voice, and laryngeal imaging. However, the clinical judgment of the presence or absence of dysphonia is made early in the diagnostic process. Subsequent testing with voice measures is done to increase the probability that dysphonia is or is not present. The clinical usefulness of the measures used to diagnose dysphonia, beyond a clinician's initial clinical impression, has not been established.; The current investigation determined the clinical usefulness–validity and accuracy–of six voice impairment measures of body function/structure and activity/participation for differentiating normal from dysphonic adults. An observational research design was used to test the performance of twenty-six adult dysphonic participants, who varied in severity of impairment, with that of twenty-six normal adults. An operational definition of dysphonia was applied as a reference standard for correct diagnosis. Pre-test and post-test diagnostic probabilities were compared using the likelihood ratio as an index of accuracy. In addition, possible threats to test accuracy by demographic variables, relationships between body function/structure and activity/participation, and the usefulness of combining measures were examined.; Results indicated that the accuracy of the clinician's initial impression of the presence of dysphonia is improved when supplemented with a measure of body function/structure and activity/participation. Five of the six voice measures were valid for differentiating normal from dysphonic adults. Demographic variables did not threaten the accuracy of individual tests for determining dysphonic performance. There was a significant relationship between some, but not all of the impairment measures in the dysphonic sample. And, combining a measure of body function/structure with activity/participation improved the accuracy of making a correct diagnosis of dysphonia.
机译:语音临床医生使用各种方法来诊断声音障碍,包括临床访谈,知觉/听觉评估,语音的声学和空气动力学特性分析以及喉部成像。但是,在诊断过程的早期就做出了关于是否存在声音障碍的临床判断。随后进行了语音测试,以增加存在或不存在声音障碍的可能性。除了临床医生最初的临床印象之外,尚未确定用于诊断声音障碍的措施的临床实用性。当前的研究确定了六种声音折衷的身体功能/结构和活动/参与程度的语音测量方法的临床有效性,有效性和准确性,以区分正常人和发音困难的成年人。观察性研究设计用于测试26位成年人的重音障碍参与者和26位正常成年人的表现,他们的损伤严重程度各不相同。言语障碍的操作定义被用作正确诊断的参考标准。使用似然比作为准确性指标比较了测试前和测试后的诊断概率。此外,还研究了人口统计学变量,身体功能/结构与活动/参与之间的关系以及组合措施的有用性可能对测试准确性造成的威胁。结果表明,当补充身体功能/结构和活动/参与度的测量值时,临床医生对声音障碍存在的最初印象的准确性会提高。六种语音测量中的五种可以有效区分正常人和发音困难的成年人。人口统计学变量不会威胁到确定发音障碍性能的单个测试的准确性。在语音样本中,某些(但不是全部)减损措施之间存在显着的关系。并且,将身体功能/结构的度量与活动/参与相结合提高了做出正确诊断音障碍的准确性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hapner, Edie Renee.;

  • 作者单位

    Vanderbilt University.;

  • 授予单位 Vanderbilt University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Speech Pathology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 137 p.
  • 总页数 137
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号