首页> 外文学位 >John Harbison's 'Simple Daylight': A Textual and Musical Analysis.
【24h】

John Harbison's 'Simple Daylight': A Textual and Musical Analysis.

机译:约翰·哈比森(John Harbison)的“简单日光”:文本和音乐分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

John Harbison's choice of literary material for his vocal repertoire has been diverse, ranging from classic poets such as Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Emily Dickinson, and Thomas Hardy to modern and even ancient writers, such as Elizabeth Bishop, William Carlos Williams, Czeslaw Milosz, and translations of the fifteenth-century Hindu poet Mirabai. At the same time, Harbison has been drawn to certain poets several times, including Eugenio Montale, Emily Dickinson, William Carlos Williams, and the art historian Michael Fried.;Despite the fact that Fried is a lesser-known poet, Harbison has been drawn to set his verse repeatedly. Simple Daylight, however, is the only vocal work of Harbison that relies solely on Fried's texts. This thesis explores the reasons why Harbison was inspired to set Fried's poems so many times.;In the program note for Simple Daylight, Harbison wrote that his ordering of Fried's poems made "a sequence closer in tone to a Bach cantata text than to a nineteenth-century song cycle" and evoked "a sub-cutaneous narrative very favorable for musical purposes, but no doubt unintended by the poet." This statement begs the question of how the ordering of the texts made the piece more akin to a Bach cantata than a nineteenth-century song cycle.;At first glance, Simple Daylight seems to fit the definition of a song cycle. Harbison himself asserted that the ordering of the poems suggested a "sub-cutaneous narrative"---a thread that drew the pieces into a whole. Might Harbison have employed other cyclic devices as well, such as common musical motives or a reprise of music within the work?;In order to answer these questions, I analyzed Simple Daylight to discover why Harbison believed that the piece was textually more akin to a Bach cantata than a song cycle. This analysis involved researching the primary characteristics of Bach's cantata texts and comparing these to the texts of Simple Daylight. Then I examined the musical treatment of the poetry, and, through the use of set theory, I identified musical and structural devices that unify the piece. These analyses ultimately revealed whether the piece is a true song cycle or merely a set of songs with texts by the same poet that are organized in a cantata-like fashion.
机译:约翰·哈比森(John Harbison)为声乐曲目选择的文学材料多种多样,从古典诗人(如约翰·沃尔夫冈·冯·歌德,艾米丽·狄金森和托马斯·哈迪)到现代甚至古代作家,如伊丽莎白·毕晓普,威廉·卡洛斯·威廉姆斯,塞斯洛夫·米洛什,以及15世纪印度诗人米拉拜(Mirabai)的翻译。同时,哈比森曾多次被某些诗人吸引,包括欧金尼奥·蒙塔莱(Eugenio Montale),艾米丽·狄金森(Emily Dickinson),威廉·卡洛斯·威廉姆斯(William Carlos Williams)和艺术史学家迈克尔·弗里德(Michael Fried)。反复讲他的经文。然而,《简单的白天》是哈比森唯一的声音作品,仅依靠弗里德的文字。本文探讨了为什么哈比森受到如此多的启发来创作弗里德的诗歌的原因。;在《简明日光》的节目单中,哈比森写道,他对弗里德的诗歌的排序使“在音调上更接近巴赫颂赞曲而不是第十九位”。个世纪的歌曲循环”,并唤起“一种非常适合音乐用途的皮下叙事,但毫无疑问是诗人意料之外的”。这句话引出了一个问题,即与19世纪的歌曲循环相比,文本的排序如何使作品更像巴赫合唱曲。乍看之下,Simple Daylight似乎适合歌曲循环的定义。哈比森本人断言,诗歌的顺序暗示​​着一种“皮下叙事”,一种将作品碎片化为整体的线。可能哈比森还采用了其他周期性装置,例如常见的音乐动机或作品中的音乐重现吗?;为了回答这些问题,我分析了《简明日光》,以发现哈比森为何认为该作品在文字上更像是巴赫合唱曲比歌曲循环。这项分析涉及研究巴赫合唱文本的主要特征,并将其与《简单日光》的文本进行比较。然后,我检查了诗歌的音乐处理方式,并通过运用集合论确定了使作品统一的音乐和结构装置。这些分析最终揭示出这首歌是一个真正的歌曲周期,还是仅仅是同一位诗人以文本形式构成的一组歌曲,这些歌曲以类似颂赞曲的形式组织起来。

著录项

  • 作者

    Duggins Pender, Amy.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Cincinnati.;

  • 授予单位 University of Cincinnati.;
  • 学科 Music.
  • 学位 D.M.A.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 123 p.
  • 总页数 123
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号