首页> 外文学位 >The consensus conference: Understanding collective learning in a deliberative process.
【24h】

The consensus conference: Understanding collective learning in a deliberative process.

机译:共识会议:在协商过程中了解集体学习。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This is a story of a diverse group of ordinary citizens who participated in an experiment in deliberative democracy. The case is of the Citizens' Conference on Food Biotechnology which followed a process called a consensus conference---a mechanism of participatory technology assessment. It explores the nature of the citizen's learning that was embedded in the process, and the influence on that learning by the social, institutional and procedural contexts within which the experience was situated.; Building on Kilgore's (1999) theory of collective learning in social movements and Kluver et al.'s (2000) study of public deliberation in Europe, the model of learning presented here is a model of practice, of how learning happens in a deliberative process and how the learning environment may be designed to foster collective learning. Learning in the Citizens' Conference is dual in nature, characterized by a reciprocal relationship between individual learners and the collective who move through four stages: scoping, sorting, transforming and negotiating. Collective reflection and an imperative to reach consensus are key elements that help to shape the collective consciousness and trigger the emergence of a collective identity. The collective then assigns meaning to the experience from which decisions are made and actions taken.; The collective learning process is significantly influenced by the degree to which the conditions are democratic. The societal, institutional and procedural contexts also have an important impact on collective learning and the ability of citizen participants to take socially meaningful action. Collective learning is enhanced and democratized by the inclusion of a comprehensive suite of disciplines and perspectives, including the tacit knowledge of the participating citizens. The Citizens' Conference, through the inclusion of a broad array of participants and perspectives, provided the opportunity for a critical and collective assessment of the topic reducing the uncertainty inherent in the technology and the mitigating the unequal distribution of power, knowledge and access.
机译:这是一群参加协商民主试验的普通公民的故事。案例是食品生物技术公民会议,该会议遵循了称为共识会议的程序,即参与性技术评估机制。它探讨了嵌入过程中的公民学习的本质,以及体验所处的社会,制度和程序环境对该学习的影响。基于Kilgore(1999)在社会运动中的集体学习理论和Kluver等人(2000)在欧洲进行的公共协商研究,在此提出的学习模型是实践的模型,说明了学习在协商过程中如何发生以及如何设计学习环境以促进集体学习。公民大会的学习本质上是双重的,其特征是个人学习者与集体之间的相互关系,他们经历了四个阶段:范围界定,排序,转换和谈判。集体反思和达成共识的必要条件是有助于塑造集体意识并触发集体身份出现的关键因素。然后,集体为决策和采取行动的经验赋予意义。集体学习的过程在很大程度上取决于条件民主的程度。社会,机构和程序环境也对集体学习和公民参与者采取具有社会意义的行动的能力产生重要影响。通过包含一整套综合的学科和观点,包括参与公民的默认知识,集体学习得到了加强和民主化。公民大会通过广泛的与会者和观点的参与,为对该主题进行批判性和集体评估提供了机会,从而减少了技术固有的不确定性并减轻了权力,知识和获取渠道的不平等分配。

著录项

  • 作者

    Eastlick, Deborah Laurelle.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Calgary (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Calgary (Canada).;
  • 学科 Education Adult and Continuing.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 191 p.
  • 总页数 191
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 成人教育、业余教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号