首页> 外文学位 >Supporting Public Health Policy Decision-Making through Economic Evaluation: Applications and Methods.
【24h】

Supporting Public Health Policy Decision-Making through Economic Evaluation: Applications and Methods.

机译:通过经济评估支持公共卫生政策决策:应用和方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The extent to which economic evaluations of public health programs in Ontario are conducted and used by decision makers is currently very limited. This thesis supports public health decision-making through applied and methodological work. The applied work demonstrates different methods to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions using the examples of seasonal and pandemic influenza immunization programs. The methodological component explores whether time horizon choice, one methodological consideration in economic evaluations, introduces bias.;The economic evaluation of Ontario's universal influenza immunization program (UIIP) uses primarily provincial health administrative databases to assess the impact of UIIP on health outcomes (quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), mortality), health care resource use (physician office visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations), and costs due to seasonal influenza. Ontario's UIIP was found to be cost-effective compared to a targeted program.;The economic evaluation of Ontario's H1N1 (2009) mass immunization program uses a mathematical modeling approach to describe the pandemic as observed in Ontario. By removing immunization from the simulation, the impact of the program was evaluated. Outcome measures include health outcomes (attack rate, deaths, QALYs), resource use, and cost (physician office visits, emergency department visits, hospitalizations). The analysis found Ontario's mass immunization program to be highly cost-effective despite high program cost.;The methodological component investigates whether time horizon choice, a major methodological choice, introduces bias to economic evaluations. The existence, magnitude and direction of time horizon bias are demonstrated using a formal model. This work supports current guidelines in recommending a lifetime time horizon and provides a framework to discuss bias in economic evaluations.;This thesis demonstrates different approaches to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions, informs decision-making, and establishes the groundwork to guide future economic evaluations of public health interventions.
机译:目前,决策者对安大略省公共卫生计划进行经济评估的程度非常有限。本文通过应用和方法论工作来支持公共卫生决策。应用的工作以季节性和大流行性流感免疫计划为例,展示了评估公共卫生干预措施成本效益的不同方法。方法论部分探讨了时间范围的选择是否是经济评估中的一种方法论考虑是否引入了偏见。;安大略省的通用流感免疫计划(UIIP)的经济评估主要使用省级卫生行政数据库来评估UIIP对健康结果的影响(质量-调整的生命年(QALYs),死亡率),医疗保健资源的使用(医生就诊,急诊就诊和住院)以及季节性流感造成的费用。与目标计划相比,安大略省的UIIP具有更高的成本效益。安大略省的H1N1(2009)大规模免疫计划的经济评估使用数学建模方法来描述在安大略省所观察到的大流行。通过从模拟中删除免疫程序,评估了程序的影响。结果指标包括健康结局(发作率,死亡,QALYs),资源使用和成本(医生就诊,急诊就诊,住院)。分析发现,尽管计划成本很高,但安大略省的大规模免疫计划仍具有很高的成本效益。方法论部分调查了时间范围选择(一种主要的方法选择)是否会给经济评估带来偏见。使用正式模型证明了时间层偏差的存在,大小和方向。这项工作支持当前的建议,以推荐一生的时间范围,并提供了一个框架来讨论经济评估中的偏见。本论文展示了评估公共卫生干预措施成本效益,为决策提供依据的各种方法,并为指导工作奠定了基础。未来对公共卫生干预措施的经济评估。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sander, Beate Helga.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Public Health.;Health Sciences Health Care Management.;Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 172 p.
  • 总页数 172
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号