首页> 外文学位 >Consultants' advice to adopt management control systems: The joint effect of persuasion triggers and manager competence.
【24h】

Consultants' advice to adopt management control systems: The joint effect of persuasion triggers and manager competence.

机译:采纳管理控制系统的顾问建议:说服触发因素和经理能力的共同作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

CFOs and other managers depend on consultants to provide advice on management control systems (MCS) and the expertise to implement these systems. However, there is little evidence on the determinants of the consultant's advice about whether managers should adopt management control systems. I use multiple methods to investigate this ill-understood research question. In study 1, I interview senior practitioners to better understand the context and identify the manifestations of two common persuasion tactics in the consulting setting, specifically social proof and scarcity (Cialdini 1993; 2001), which are likely to influence the consultant's advice to the manager.;In study 2, I conduct an experiment using professional consultants to investigate whether the consultant's advice to adopt an MCS depends on its distinctiveness (i.e. whether or not the manager's competitors have adopted the tool) and the manager's competence. I predict and find that distinctiveness triggers the persuasion tactics of social proof or scarcity, and that the consultant applies these tactics based on the manager's competence. Consultants are more likely to advise a distinctive versus non-distinctive MCS to an exceptional manager, while they are more likely to advise a non-distinctive MCS to an average manager. I provide evidence that consultants apply different persuasion tactics based on the competence of the manager. I also provide evidence that consultants believe that their advice will benefit the manager on multiple key performance indicators (KPIs). Consistent with persuasion theory, differences in these anticipated benefits explain the consultant's advice to the exceptional manager, but not to the average manager. Finally, I discuss practical and theoretical implications of these studies.
机译:首席财务官和其他经理依赖顾问来提供有关管理控制系统(MCS)和实施这些系统的专业知识的建议。但是,关于管理者是否应采用管理控制系统的顾问建议的决定因素的证据很少。我使用多种方法来调查这个未被理解的研究问题。在研究1中,我采访了高级从业人员,以更好地了解背景并确定咨询环境中两种常见的说服策略的表现形式,特别是社会证明和稀缺性(Cialdini 1993; 2001),这很可能会影响顾问对经理的建议。在研究2中,我使用专业顾问进行了一项实验,以调查顾问采用MCS的建议是否取决于其独特性(即经理的竞争对手是否采用了该工具)和经理的能力。我预测并发现,独特性会触发社会证明或稀缺性的说服策略,而顾问则根据经理的能力运用这些策略。顾问更有可能向杰出经理建议与众不同的MCS,而非非区别MCS,而普通经理则更有可能向他们推荐非独特的MCS。我提供的证据表明,顾问根据经理的能力采用不同的说服策略。我还提供证据表明,顾问认为他们的建议将使经理在多个关键绩效指标(KPI)上受益。与说服理论相一致,这些预期收益之间的差异解释了顾问对高级经理的建议,而不是对普通经理的建议。最后,我讨论了这些研究的实践和理论意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Leiby, Justin.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.;Business Administration Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 99 p.
  • 总页数 99
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号