首页> 外文学位 >Charter and Direct Run Schools of the Recovery School District (RSD) and Orleans Parish School Board (OPSB) Comparison of High Stakes Tests and Dropout Rates.
【24h】

Charter and Direct Run Schools of the Recovery School District (RSD) and Orleans Parish School Board (OPSB) Comparison of High Stakes Tests and Dropout Rates.

机译:恢复学区(RSD)和奥尔良教区学校董事会(OPSB)的特许学校和直接办学的高风险测试和辍学率比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The city of New Orleans has embarked on an historic experiment reinventing its schools -- once considered among the worst in the country -- from a centralized, single district model of education to a two district model in which both the Recovery School District (RSD) and the preexisting Orleans Parish School Board (OPSB) both operate direct run and charter schools. This restructuring has been hailed by some as one of the best things that ever happened to education in New Orleans. The issue that prompted this research was the efficacy of the basic assumptions underlying the stated purposes of the creation of the Recovery School District (RSD) alongside the pre-existing Orleans Parish School Board (OPSB). Essentially, the basic notion was that the RSD could improve the education of public school students, resulting in enhanced achievement and greater persistence in school, and that charter schools would be a significant aspect of the RSD to enhance the effectiveness of public education. Thus, hypotheses were constructed to test differences on performance indicators between school districts (OPSB vs. RSD) and types of administration (charter vs. direct) for the following four dependent variables: 1. Drop-out rates for 8th graders, 2. Drop-out rates for 11 th graders, 3. The Louisiana Educational Assessment Program (LEAP) scores for 8th graders, and 4. Graduation Exit Examination (GEE) scores for 11th graders;The percentages of drop-outs and the percentages with "failing" LEAP and GEE scores were analyzed in (2X2) ANOVAs with type of administration and school district as main effects and the total enrollment in 2010 as a covariate process before the main effects in performing the ANOVA with the general linear model. Under this approach, the significance of the difference between the drop-out rates of charter and non-charter schools in the OPSB and the RSD were tested in a two-step hypothesis-testing procedure using the F-ratio to test the statistical significance of the association and Eta-squared to test the strength of the association between type of school and school district with the percentage of students dropping out and failing the Louisiana Educational Assessment Program (LEAP), (8th graders) and the Graduation Exit Examination (GEE), (11th graders) which are part of Louisiana's criterion-referenced testing (CRT) program and are high-stakes tests.;Overall, the results substantiated that while charter schools have been successful in out-performing directly administered schools in both the OPSB and the RSD, the RSD has brought no significant improvement in terms of drop-out rates or student performance on LEAP and GEE. Analyses of LEAP and GEE scores generally, yet inconsistently, substantiated superior performance in the OPSB and by charter schools in both districts. In particular the analysis indicates consistently better performance in charter schools in the OPSB compared to charter schools in the RSD. Therefore, while there is evidence of the effectiveness of the charter school innovation generally, there is no evidence of superior efficacy of the RSD. The charter schools that appear to have better performance in many instances are in the OPSB, which generally outperforms the RSD.
机译:新奥尔良市已着手进行一项历史性的实验,重塑其学校-曾经被认为是该国最差的学校-从集中的单一学区教育模式到两个学区模式,其中都包括恢复学区(RSD)和先前存在的奥尔良教区学校委员会(OPSB)都经营直接运营和特许学校。有人称这种重组是新奥尔良教育史上最好的事情之一。促使这项研究的问题是,与先前存在的奥尔良教区学校委员会(OPSB)一起建立恢复学区(RSD)的既定目的所依据的基本假设的有效性。从根本上说,基本概念是RSD可以改善公立学校学生的教育,从而提高成绩并提高学校的持久性,而特许学校将是RSD增强公共教育有效性的重要方面。因此,针对以下四个因变量构建了假设以测试学区之间的绩效指标(OPSB与RSD)和行政管理类型(章程与直接)之间的差异:1.八年级学生的辍学率; 2.辍学率11年级学生的辍学率,3年级学生的3.路易斯安那州教育评估计划(LEAP)分数和11年级学生的4.毕业考试(GEE)分数;辍学率和“不及格”率在(2X2)方差分析中对LEAP和GEE得分进行了分析,其中行政类型和学区为主要影响因素,2010年的总入学人数为协变量过程,然后才采用通用线性模型进行方差分析。在这种方法下,OPSB和RSD中特许学校和非特许学校的辍学率差异的显着性通过F比率通过两步假设检验程序进行检验,以检验协会和Eta平方检验了学校类型与学区之间的关联强度,其中学生辍学和未通过路易斯安那教育评估计划(LEAP),8年级学生和毕业考试(GEE)的学生比例,(11年级学生),这是路易斯安那州的标准参照考试(CRT)计划的一部分,属于高风险考试。总体而言,结果证实,虽然特许学校在OPSB和在RSD方面,RSD在LEAP和GEE的辍学率或学生成绩方面没有带来任何显着改善。 LEAP和GEE分数的分析总体上却不一致地证实了OPSB和两个地区的特许学校的优异表现。尤其是,该分析表明,与RSD的特许学校相比,OPSB的特许学校的绩效始终更好。因此,虽然有证据表明总体上特许学校创新的有效性,但没有证据表明RSD具有更好的功效。在许多情况下,表现较好的特许学校都在OPSB中,其表现通常优于RSD。

著录项

  • 作者

    Andry, Beverly Guillory.;

  • 作者单位

    Southern University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.;

  • 授予单位 Southern University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.;
  • 学科 Education Tests and Measurements.;Education Policy.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.;Education Evaluation.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 267 p.
  • 总页数 267
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:04

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号