首页> 外文学位 >Damping estimation of plates for statistical energy analysis.
【24h】

Damping estimation of plates for statistical energy analysis.

机译:用于统计能量分析的板的阻尼估计。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Power Input Method (P.I.M.) and the Impulse Response Decay Method (I.R.D.M.) are used to evaluate how the accuracy of damping loss factor estimation for plates is affected with respect to various processing parameters, such as the frequency resolution, the frequency bandwidth, the number of measurement locations, and the signal to noise ratio. In several computational experiments, accuracy is assessed for a wide range of damping loss factors from low (0.1%) to moderate (1%) to high (10%). A wide range of frequency is considered, including "low frequencies" for which modal density is less than one per band.;The Power Input Method (P.I.M.) is first validated with computational studies of an analytical single degree of freedom oscillator. Experimental loss factor estimates for plates (multiple degree of freedom systems) are also computed using the P.I.M. algorithm. The P.I.M. is shown to estimate loss factors with reasonable accuracy for highly damped plates in the 300 Hz - 4000 Hz, wherein modal density exceeds unit value. In this case "reasonable accuracy" means the estimated loss factors are within 10% of those predicted by the impulse response decay method. For lower damping levels the method fails.;The analytical Impulse Response Decay Method (I.R.D.M.) is validated by the use of two computational models: a single degree of freedom oscillator and a uniform rectangular panel. The panel computational model is a finite element model of a rectangular plate mechanically excited at a single point. The computational model is used to systematically evaluate the effect of frequency resolution, frequency bandwidth, the number of measurement points used in the computations, and noise level for all the three levels of damping. The "optimized" I.R.D.M. is shown to accurately estimate damping in plate simulations with low to moderate levels of damping with a deviation of no more than 2% from the known damping value. For highly damped plates the I.R.D.M. tends to under-estimate loss factors at high frequency. Experimental loss factor estimation for an aluminum plate with full constrained layer damping treatment, classified as a highly damped plate, and an undamped steel plate, classified as a lightly damped plate are computed using the "optimized" I.R.D.M. algorithm.;Statistical Energy Analysis (S.E.A.), which is a natural extension of the Power Input Method, is used to evaluate coupling loss factors for two sets of plates, one set joined along a line and the other set joined at a point. Two alternative coupling loss factor estimation algorithms are studied, one using individual plate loss factor estimations, and the other using the loss factors of the plates estimated when the plates are coupled. The modal parameters (modal density and coupling loss factors) for both sets of plates are estimated experimentally and are compared with theoretical results. The estimations show reasonable agreement between agreement and theory that is, within 5 % for the damped system of plates. For the undamped system of plates the results are less accurate with deviations of more than 100% at low modal density and approximately 30% variation at higher frequencies.
机译:功率输入法(PIM)和脉冲响应衰减法(IRDM)用于评估板的阻尼损耗因子估算的精度如何影响各种处理参数,例如频率分辨率,频率带宽,测量位置的数量以及信噪比。在一些计算实验中,评估了从低(0.1%)到中度(1%)到高(10%)的各种阻尼损耗因子的准确性。考虑了宽范围的频率,包括模态密度小于每个频带的“低频”。功率输入法(P.I.M.)首先通过分析性单自由度振荡器的计算研究得到验证。板块(多个自由度系统)的实验损耗因子估计值也使用P.I.M.算法。 P.I.M.可以看出,在300 Hz-4000 Hz的高阻尼板中,模态密度超过了单位值,可以估算出合理合理的损耗因子。在这种情况下,“合理的准确性”是指估计的损耗因子在脉冲响应衰减方法预测的损耗因子的10%以内。对于较低的阻尼水平,该方法将失败。;分析的脉冲响应衰减方法(I.R.D.M.)通过使用两个计算模型进行了验证:一个自由度振荡器和一个均匀的矩形面板。面板计算模型是在单点机械激发的矩形板的有限元模型。计算模型用于系统评估频率分辨率,频率带宽,计算中使用的测量点数以及所有三个阻尼级别的噪声级别的影响。 「最佳化」的I.R.D.M.示出了在低或中等阻尼水平下与已知阻尼值的偏差不超过2%的情况下,可以精确估算板模拟中的阻尼。对于高阻尼板,I.R.D.M。往往会高估低损耗因子。使用“优化的” I.R.D.M.计算出对具有完全约束层阻尼处理的铝板(归类为高阻尼板)和未阻尼钢板(归类为轻度阻尼板)的实验损耗因子估计。统计能量分析(S.E.A.)是功率输入法的自然扩展,用于评估两组板的耦合损耗因子,一组沿一条线连接,另一组沿一点连接。研究了两种可选的耦合损耗因子估计算法,一种使用单个板损耗因子估计,另一种使用板耦合时估计的板损耗因子。两组实验板的模态参数(模态密度和耦合损耗因子)均通过实验估算,并与理论结果进行了比较。估计值显示出协议和理论之间的合理一致性,对于阻尼板系统,误差在5%以内。对于无阻尼板系统,结果的准确性较差,在低模态密度下的偏差大于100%,而在较高频率下的偏差约为30%。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vatti, Kranthi Kumar.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Applied Mechanics.;Engineering Aerospace.;Physics Acoustics.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 138 p.
  • 总页数 138
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号