首页> 外文学位 >Green profit design for lifecycle.
【24h】

Green profit design for lifecycle.

机译:生命周期的绿色利润设计。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

"Green Profit" refers to economic profits generated by an environmentally sustainable business. As awareness of sustainability increases and environmental regulations become more stringent, manufacturers are faced with the challenge of making a green profit in their businesses. Recovering end-of-life products after customer use is a promising solution to this challenge. Various recovery options, including reuse, refurbishment, remanufacturing, and material recovery, can make it possible for companies to comply with environmental legislation and also gain social and economic benefits. This dissertation presents a design approach, referred to as "Green Profit Design," to help maximize green profits from end-of-life recovery of products.;Green Profit Design is a Design for Recovery approach that facilitates green and profitable end-of-life recovery of products by establishing a clear link between product design and end-of-life recovery. Product design features, including product architecture, functional performance, and material properties, greatly affect the economic and environmental performances of end-of-life recovery. Therefore, the most important factors in achieving green profit are an understanding of how design decisions affect actual end-of-life recovery and understanding the economic and environmental implications of the design. The Design for Recovery methods introduced in this dissertation evaluate product design from a recovery perspective and provide a quantitative assessment of how good or how bad a product design is in terms of both recovery profit and environmental impact. The methods can be utilized for either design improvement or design selection.;An original contribution of this dissertation is that it provides the foundation for integrating the different perspectives on end-of-life recovery of different domains, i.e., design engineering, environmental engineering, and business. Another important contribution is its thorough coverage of recovery processes. In addition to technical and operational issues, the methods in this dissertation also cover the recovery processes at the front end (i.e., product take-back and reverse logistics) and the back end (i.e., remarketing of recovered items) and suggest an advanced approach for coordinating and managing the entire process more effectively.;This dissertation presents two empirical studies, four Design for Recovery methods, and three extended studies on further refinement of the four methods. Using statistical analyses, the empirical studies investigate the challenges that the Design for Recovery approach must overcome. The current industry practice of electronics recovery is examined to gain a better understanding of the design issues associated with end-of-life recovery.;The Design for Recovery methods focus on evaluating the design of the original product from a recovery perspective. The first three methods consider the case in which the second-life products recovered from the end-of-life products have a pre-defined design. Optimization models for evaluating a single product and for evaluating the design of a family of products are presented, and the effects of product obsolescence and deterioration at the time of end-of-life recovery are also analyzed. The fourth method is focused more on how to remarket end-of-life products, and it provides the advanced tools required for market positioning to optimize the design and the price of a second-life product.;The three extended studies focus on environmental implications of end-of-life recovery and discuss appropriate timing utilizing recovery principles. End-of-life recovery is basically a strategy for extending the life of a product by reusing, refurbishing, or remanufacturing that product. The studies demonstrate that an extended lifetime may not always be environmentally sustainable, and that shortening the lifetime may actually be better in some cases. To help decide on the optimal lifetime strategy for a given product, lifecycle assessment (LCA) approaches for a large-scale system are discussed, and an analytical model is proposed for planning optimal lifetime of a given product based on the LCA approach.
机译:“绿色利润”是指由环境可持续业务产生的经济利润。随着对可持续发展意识的增强和环境法规的日益严格,制造商面临着在其业务中实现绿色利润的挑战。客户使用后恢复报废产品是解决这一挑战的有希望的解决方案。各种回收方法,包括再利用,翻新,再制造和材料回收,可以使公司遵守环境法规并获得社会和经济利益。本文提出一种设计方法,称为“绿色利润设计”,以帮助从产品报废回收中最大程度地获得绿色利润。;绿色利润设计是一种“回收设计”方法,可促进绿色和可盈利的报废。通过在产品设计和使用寿命终止之间建立明确的联系来实现产品的使用寿命恢复。产品设计特征,包括产品结构,功能性能和材料性能,极大地影响着使用寿命终止后的经济和环境性能。因此,获得绿色利润的最重要因素是了解设计决策如何影响实际报废的回收以及了解设计对经济和环境的影响。本文从回收的角度对产品设计进行了评估,并从回收利润和环境影响两个方面对产品设计的优劣进行了定量评估。该方法既可以用于设计改进,也可以用于设计选择。本文的主要贡献在于,它为整合不同领域生命周期恢复的不同观点提供了基础,例如设计工程,环境工程,和业务。另一个重要的贡献是它对恢复过程的全面覆盖。除了技术和操作问题外,本文中的方法还涵盖了前端(即产品回收和逆向物流)和后端(即回收的物品再营销)的恢复过程,并提出了一种先进的方法为了更有效地协调和管理整个过程。本文提出了两个实证研究,四个为回收设计的方法,以及对四个方法的进一步完善的三个扩展的研究。使用统计分析,实证研究调查了“恢复设计”方法必须克服的挑战。对电子回收的当前行业实践进行了研究,以更好地理解与寿命终止回收相关的设计问题。回收设计方法着重于从回收角度评估原始产品的设计。前三种方法考虑了从报废产品中回收的第二批产品具有预定设计的情况。提出了用于评估单个产品和评估一个产品系列设计的优化模型,并分析了产品报废和报废回收时性能下降的影响。第四种方法更多地侧重于如何对报废产品进行再营销,它提供了市场定位所需的高级工具,以优化第二种报废产品的设计和价格。这三项扩展的研究重点在于对环境的影响寿命恢复,并讨论利用恢复原理的适当时机。报废回收基本上是通过重复使用,翻新或重新制造产品来延长产品寿命的策略。研究表明,延长使用寿命可能并不总是在环境上可持续的,缩短寿命实际上在某些情况下可能更好。为了帮助确定给定产品的最佳使用寿命策略,讨论了针对大型系统的生命周期评估(LCA)方法,并提出了一种基于LCA方法规划给定产品最佳使用寿命的分析模型。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kwak, Minjung.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Engineering Industrial.;Engineering Mechanical.;Engineering Environmental.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 293 p.
  • 总页数 293
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号