首页> 外文学位 >Withholding political authority: Civil society and people's power in Zimbabwe.
【24h】

Withholding political authority: Civil society and people's power in Zimbabwe.

机译:保留政治权威:津巴布韦的民间社会和人民的权力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The relationship of civil society to the state is rarely antagonistic and at most times supportive. The political regime and civil society are taken to be interdependent social structures that interact through hegemonic, supportive and socially constructed dimensions. Given this interdependency, when does civil society challenge authority or does its efforts rise to the level of a people's power revolution? When does it act to dismantle the political regime or seek to reconstruct it? This project attempts to shed light on how civil society mobilizes a people's power capable of challenging political authority through the story of its ongoing struggles to pursue social objectives in Zimbabwe in the 1990s.;Since 1980, the Zimbabwe African National Union (Zanu) controlled the only post-colonial government Zimbabwe has known. Drawing from its revolutionary credentials it set out to finish the interrupted war for Zimbabwean Independence. This objective resonated with civil society less and less over time as groups began to see Zanu's promises as hollow and its corruption and patronage systems as the primary obstacle in accomplishing their objectives. This development is explored through a grassroots empowerment movement, the Organisation of Rural Associations for Progress, the widespread protests in 1997 catalyzed by the Zimbabwean Congress of Trade Unions and the efforts to rebuild the constitutional order spearheaded by the National Constitutional Assembly.;The story points to at least three civil society strategies to locate power within the people and counter political power: 1) constructing political alternatives within the existing regime, 2) mass withdrawal of support for the authority of the regime and 3) reconstruction of the social contract. Nevertheless, civil society did not succeed in dismantling the political regime, hampered by the continuing capacity of the state to exert hegemonic control, remove the pillars of civil society support and exploit polarized values within civil society.;Despite the terrible destruction of social and economic fabric of the country by the political struggles of the 2000s, the ongoing development of democratic values and the diminishing importance of the interrupted revolution can provide a glimmer of hope for the future transformation of the country.
机译:公民社会与国家之间的关系很少是对立的,大多数时候是支持的。政治体制和公民社会被认为是相互依存的社会结构,它们通过霸权,支持和社会建构的维度相互作用。鉴于这种相互依存关系,民间社会何时会挑战权威或它的努力会上升到人民力量革命的水平?它什么时候起拆除政治政权或寻求重建的作用?该项目试图通过1990年代津巴布韦为实现社会目标而不断奋斗的故事来阐明民间社会如何动员具有挑战政治权威的人民的力量。自1980年以来,津巴布韦非洲民族联盟(Zanu)控制着只有后殖民政府津巴布韦才知道。凭借其革命性的声誉,它着手完成津巴布韦独立的打断战争。随着人们开始逐渐将Zanu的承诺视为空洞,并将其腐败和庇护制度视为实现其目标的主要障碍,这一目标在越来越少的时间内与公民社会产生了共鸣。这项发展是通过基层的赋权运动,农村进步组织组织,津巴布韦工会代表大会在1997年发起的广泛抗议活动以及重建由国民立宪会议牵头的宪法秩序的努力来探索的。至少三个民间社会战略,以在人民内部建立权力并对抗政治权力:1)在现有政权内构建政治替代方案; 2)大规模撤消对政权的支持,以及3)重建社会契约。然而,公民社会未能成功地瓦解政治政权,受到国家持续行使霸权控制,消除公民社会支持的支柱以及在公民社会内部利用两极化价值观的持续能力的阻碍。通过2000年代的政治斗争构成的国家结构,民主价值观的不断发展以及中断的革命的重要性不断下降,可以为该国的未来转型提供一线希望。

著录项

  • 作者

    DuPree, A. Scott.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Denver.;

  • 授予单位 University of Denver.;
  • 学科 Political Science Public Administration.;Political Science International Relations.;African Studies.;South African Studies.;Sociology Social Structure and Development.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 221 p.
  • 总页数 221
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号