首页> 外文学位 >'Thirty years of lies': Portrayal of the media in the works of Dovlatov, E. Popov, Gorlanova, and Pelevin.
【24h】

'Thirty years of lies': Portrayal of the media in the works of Dovlatov, E. Popov, Gorlanova, and Pelevin.

机译:“三十年的谎言”:媒体在多夫拉托夫,E。Popov,Gorlanova和Pelevin作品中的表现。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation focuses upon how developments in Soviet and post-Soviet media may have affected literature and literary developments in Russia during the glasnost and post-glasnost years. To this end, this work will discuss two questions: (1) How are the media presented in the works of Soviet and Russian authors, and what does this presentation imply about the nature of the media in the Soviet Union and Russia both during and after the glasnost era? (2) Since each author's own struggle to get his or her voice heard by the media is an important theme in each respective work, how does the resolution of this theme reflect each author's own attitudes toward the media, and by extension, toward the regime which controls them?; While I will be discussing how political events have changed the concerns and goals of media interests, and how these changes have in turn affected literature as a whole, my choice of authors is based more upon their utilization of media forms within their literary works. Sergei Dovlatov's novel The Compromise directly focuses upon situations faced by the author during his time spent as a journalist for a Soviet newspaper in Estonia. Evgeny Popov's The Splendor of Life uses newspaper articles as a parallel to his own personal reminiscences. Nina Gorlanova's Confessional Days is also personal, as the author/narrator attempts to reconcile her life not only with the advent of glasnost but the bombardment of images presented to her by newly-free media. Viktor Pelevin's Generation P is, finally, a postmodern attempt to address the issue of a culture being threatened with annexation from the West, and how television has been integrated into the daily life of the Russian people.
机译:本文着眼于在格拉斯诺斯特时代和格拉斯诺斯特时代,苏联和后苏联媒体的发展如何影响俄罗斯的文学和文学发展。为此,本文将讨论两个问题:(1)在苏联和俄罗斯作家的作品中媒体是如何呈现的?这种呈现方式暗示了苏联和俄罗斯在此期间和之后的媒体性质?格拉斯诺斯特时代? (2)由于每位作者自己努力让媒体发表自己的声音是每件作品的重要主题,因此该主题的解决方式如何反映出每位作者对媒体的态度,并进而反映出其对政权的态度。哪个控制着他们?虽然我将讨论政治事件如何改变了媒体兴趣的关注和目标,以及这些变化又如何反过来影响了整个文学,但我对作者的选择更多地取决于他们在文学作品中对媒体形式的利用。谢尔盖·多夫拉托夫(Sergei Dovlatov)的小说《妥协》(The Compromise)直接关注作者在爱沙尼亚一家苏联报纸担任记者期间所面临的情况。叶夫根尼·波波夫(Evgeny Popov)的《生命的辉煌》(The Splendor of Life)将报纸上的文章与他个人的回忆相提并论。妮娜·戈拉诺娃(Nina Gorlanova)的《 Conf悔日》也很个人化,作者/叙述者不仅试图调和格拉斯诺斯特的来临,还试图通过新自由媒体对她呈现的图像的轰炸来调和她的生活。最终,维克多·贝列文(Viktor Pelevin)的P世代试图解决一种文化,该文化正受到西方吞并的威胁,以及电视如何融入俄罗斯人民的日常生活中。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hubert, Christopher Alex.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia.;
  • 学科 Literature Slavic and East European.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 154 p.
  • 总页数 154
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 各国文学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号