首页> 外文学位 >The nature of voluntary disclosure around CEO change and types of CEO departure and succession.
【24h】

The nature of voluntary disclosure around CEO change and types of CEO departure and succession.

机译:关于首席执行官变更的自愿披露的性质以及首席执行官离职和继任的类型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines whether the positive or negative news nature of firms' voluntary disclosures around their CEO changes is related to the timing of disclosures (before and after CEO changes), types of CEO departure (voluntary and involuntary), and types of CEO succession (from inside or outside). It is possible that departing CEO's incentives for voluntary disclosures are different from new CEO's, so that the nature of voluntary disclosures is likely different between before and after CEO change. In addition, departing CEO's incentives to provide voluntary disclosures may also depend upon whether he leaves voluntarily or involuntarily, and new CEO's incentives may depend upon whether he is from inside or outside of the firms. The results show that the sample firms are more likely to disclose positive news before CEO change than after, and negative news after CEO change than before. The voluntary disclosure of positive news before CEO change is more likely when old CEOs leave involuntarily than when they leave voluntarily. However, the likelihood of the voluntary disclosure of negative news after CEO change is not reliably related to types of departure. Also, the nature of voluntary disclosure after CEO change is at best marginally related to types of CEO succession, from inside or outside. Taken together, the results suggest that the potential conflict of interests between departing and new CEOs affects firms' voluntary disclosure policies. The types of old CEO's departure affect firms' voluntary disclosures, while the types of new CEO's succession has little effect on voluntary disclosures.
机译:这项研究调查了企业围绕CEO变动而自愿披露的正面或负面新闻性质是否与披露时间(CEO变动前后),CEO离职类型(自愿和非自愿)以及CEO继任类型(从内部还是外部)。离任CEO自愿披露的动机可能与新任CEO有所不同,因此在CEO变更前后自愿披露的性质可能有所不同。此外,离任首席执行官提供自愿披露的激励措施还可能取决于他是自愿还是非自愿离职,而新任首席执行官的激励措施可能取决于他来自公司内部还是外部。结果表明,样本公司在首席执行官变更之前比在变更之后更可能披露正面消息,而首席执行官变更之后的负面消息则比之前更容易披露。老首席执行官非自愿离职比自愿离职更容易,因为在CEO换岗之前主动披露正面消息是很可能的。但是,首席执行官变更后自愿披露负面消息的可能性与离职类型没有可靠关系。而且,CEO更换后自愿披露的性质最多与内部或外部的CEO继任类型密切相关。两者合计,结果表明离任和新任首席执行官之间潜在的利益冲突影响了企业的自愿披露政策。老首席执行官离职的类型影响公司的自愿披露,而新首席执行官继任的类型对自愿披露影响很小。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kwak, Byungjin.;

  • 作者单位

    Purdue University.;

  • 授予单位 Purdue University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 64 p.
  • 总页数 64
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 财务管理、经济核算;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号