首页> 外文学位 >Numerical and analytical study of nanofluids thermal and hydrodynamic characteristics.
【24h】

Numerical and analytical study of nanofluids thermal and hydrodynamic characteristics.

机译:纳米流体热和流体动力特性的数值和分析研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The mechanisms of nanofluids heat transfer enhancement are still unclear. Previous studies about nanofluids have tried to solve some of many challenges about the thermal and hydrodynamic performance of nanofluids and their properties; however still there are many problems unsolved and questions without a certain answer. Hence, more studies are necessary, which can be experimental, numerical and theoretical. In the present study, nanofluids are investigated intensively using numerical and analytical approaches.;The numerical part consists of three chapters and covers a wide range of heat transfer problems, including; laminar and turbulent, single-phase and two-phase as well as mixed convection and forced convection flows. Several particle volume fractions and a large number of Reynolds numbers are considered. Chapter two is dedicated to laminar mixed convection flow of Al2O 3-water nanofluid inside a horizontal tube. Uniform heat flux is applied at the wall. Two Reynolds numbers and three particle volume fractions are used, and finally the thermal and hydrodynamic numerical results from three different two-phase models and the single phase model are compared with experimental data. It is shown that the predictions of these different approaches are extremely different. For a laminar mixed convection flow, two-phase models are in better agreement with a given experimental data. The two-phase models predictions are close but far from single-phase.;Chapter three evaluates the sensitivity of the laminar formulation on selected combinations of models for the conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids. Two models for the conductivity and three for the viscosity are chosen, which make six combinations. These choices are found to have very important effects on the final results. Therefore, every numerical study should first justify their choice of viscosity-conductivity correlations. Also, a list of the most important models for the conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids are gathered and included in this chapter.;Chapter four evaluates the predictions of single-phase and three different two-phase models for turbulent forced convection inside a horizontal tube. Uniform heat flux is applied at the wall. Realizable k-ϵ turbulent model is used, which is a two-equation model. Two sets of experimental data for different nanofluids (Al2O3-water and Cu-water) are used, which cover a wide range of volume fractions and Reynolds numbers. The single-phase results accuracy is confirmed with an appropriate selection of conductivity-viscosity combination. The results from different two-phase models are found to be very close; however, they were too far from the single-phase predictions and the experimental data. Two-phase models could not satisfy the experimental data for turbulent forced convection flow of two different nanofluids from different experimental studies, while single-phase approach does it well.;In the analytical part of the study, new models for the thermal conductivity of nanofluids and the Nusselt number of the flow around the nanoparticles are derived. These models take into account the effect of Brownian motion, interfacial thermal resistance, particles clustering, clusters size distribution and micro-convection as well as particles concentration, particles size and temperature. The clusters size and size distribution are analyzed based on the fractal theory. The proposed model for the conductivity of nanofluids is compared with experimental data from several studies for five different nanofluids and various magnitudes of volume fractions. This model is also compared with two similar models. It shows very good agreement with experiment and better performance compared to those selected models.;Keywords: Nanofluid, Thermal conductivity, Dynamic viscosity, Nusselt number, Convection, Turbulent flow, Two-Phase, Fractal theory.
机译:纳米流体传热增强的机制仍不清楚。先前有关纳米流体的研究试图解决有关纳米流体的热力学和流体力学性能及其特性的许多挑战。但是,仍然存在许多未解决的问题和没有确定答案的问题。因此,有必要进行更多的研究,包括实验,数值和理论研究。在本研究中,使用数值和分析方法对纳米流体进行了深入研究。数值部分包括三章,涵盖了广泛的传热问题,包括:层流和湍流,单相和两相以及混合对流和强制对流。考虑了几个颗粒体积分数和大量的雷诺数。第二章专门研究水平管内Al2O 3-水纳米流体的层流混合对流。在墙壁上施加均匀的热通量。使用两个雷诺数和三个粒子体积分数,最后将来自三个不同的两相模型和单相模型的热力学和流体力学数值结果与实验数据进行比较。结果表明,这些不同方法的预测极为不同。对于层流混合对流,两相模型与给定的实验数据更好地吻合。两相模型的预测接近但远非单相。第三章评估了层流配方对纳米流体电导率和粘度的模型选择组合的敏感性。选择了两个电导率模型和三个粘度模型,这六个模型组合在一起。发现这些选择对最终结果有非常重要的影响。因此,每个数值研究都应首先证明其对粘度-电导率相关性的选择的合理性。此外,本章还收集并列出了最重要的纳米流体电导率和粘度模型。第四章评估了水平管内湍流强迫对流的单相模型和三种不同的两相模型的预测。在墙壁上施加均匀的热通量。可实现的k-eps使用湍流模型,它是一个两方程模型。使用了两组针对不同纳米流体(Al2O3-水和Cu-水)的实验数据,涵盖了大范围的体积分数和雷诺数。通过适当选择电导率-粘度组合,可以确定单相结果的准确性。发现来自不同两阶段模型的结果非常接近。但是,它们与单相预测和实验数据相差太远。两相模型不能满足来自不同实验研究的两种不同纳米流体的湍流强迫对流流动的实验数据,而单相方法却能很好地满足该要求。在研究的分析部分,新的纳米流体导热系数模型推导了纳米颗粒周围流动的努塞尔数。这些模型考虑了布朗运动,界面热阻,颗粒团簇,团簇尺寸分布和微对流以及颗粒浓度,颗粒尺寸和温度的影响。基于分形理论分析了簇的大小和大小分布。将拟议的纳米流体电导率模型与针对五种不同纳米流体和各种体积分数的几项研究的实验数据进行了比较。该模型也与两个类似的模型进行了比较。与所选模型相比,它与实验具有很好的一致性,并且具有更好的性能。关键词:纳米流体,导热系数,动态粘度,努塞尔数,对流,湍流,两相分形理论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mahmood, Akbari.;

  • 作者单位

    Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada).;
  • 学科 Engineering Mechanical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 151 p.
  • 总页数 151
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号