首页> 外文学位 >A Measurement of Readiness for Tennessee Hospitals to Implement 'Meaningful Use' Criteria Resulting from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, 2009.
【24h】

A Measurement of Readiness for Tennessee Hospitals to Implement 'Meaningful Use' Criteria Resulting from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, 2009.

机译:田纳西州医院实施“有意义的使用”标准的衡量标准,该标准源于2009年的《美国复苏和再投资法案》。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was signed into law. This legislation provided for monetary rewards for those acute-care hospitals that meet "meaningful use" computerization and reporting criteria.;The study used a descriptive, nonexperimental design to answer three research questions (1) What is the level of readiness to meet "meaningful use" criteria in the Tennessee Hospital Association (THA) member hospitals; (2) What is the level of readiness to meet "meaningful use" criteria in the rural THA member hospitals; and (3) Is there a difference in the readiness to meet "meaningful use" criteria between rural and urban THA member hospitals?.;A survey was sent to 115 THA member hospital, with a return rate of 83% (N=95). The inclusion criteria focused on acute-care hospitals, with rehabilitation, psychiatric and long-term care hospitals falling into the exclusion criteria.;The Readiness Score was determined for the total survey respondents (N=95), as well as for the rural (N=41) hospitals and urban (N=54) hospitals in the Tennessee Hospital Association member hospitals meeting the inclusion criteria. Z-scores of the readiness score were examined and indicated that there was one outlier with z>3.0. Therefore, that case was removed from the comparison in the t-test (N=94). The t-test comparison of rural and urban hospital found a significant difference at (p=.002), two tailed.;To ensure that the slightly nonnormal distribution of the readiness scores did not explain the difference found with the t-test, an additional nonparametric test was also conducted. The Mann Whitney U-test showed that even with the assumption of a normal distribution is not made, the difference in readiness between urban and rural hospitals is still statistically significant at p=0.026.
机译:2009年,《美国复苏与再投资法案》签署成为法律。该立法为那些满足“有意义使用”计算机化和报告标准的急诊医院提供了金钱奖励。该研究使用了描述性,非实验性的设计来回答三个研究问题(1)满足“有意义”的准备水平是多少?在田纳西州医院协会(THA)成员医院中使用”标准; (2)在农村THA成员医院中满足“有意义使用”标准的准备程度如何; (3)城乡THA成员医院在满足“有意义使用”标准方面的准备程度是否有所不同?;向115个THA成员医院进行了调查,返回率为83%(N = 95) 。纳入标准的重点是急诊医院,康复,精神病和长期护理医院均属于排除标准;确定了总调查受访者(N = 95)以及农村地区(符合纳入标准的田纳西州医院协会成员医院中的N = 41)和城市(N = 54)医院。检查准备得分的Z评分,并指出存在一个异常值,z> 3.0。因此,在t检验中将这种情况从比较中删除(N = 94)。城乡医院的t检验比较发现(p = .002)有显着性差异,两条尾巴。为确保准备分数的略微正态分布不能解释t检验所发现的差异,还进行了其他非参数测试。曼·惠特尼U检验表明,即使未做出正态分布的假设,城乡医院之间的准备就绪率差异在统计学上也仍然很显着,p = 0.026。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wilhoit, Kathryn W.;

  • 作者单位

    East Tennessee State University.;

  • 授予单位 East Tennessee State University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Nursing.;Information Science.;Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 87 p.
  • 总页数 87
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号