首页> 外文学位 >The secret lives of African forest elephants: Using genetics, networks, and telemetry to understand sociality.
【24h】

The secret lives of African forest elephants: Using genetics, networks, and telemetry to understand sociality.

机译:非洲森林象的秘密生活:使用遗传学,网络和遥测技术来了解社会。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Identifying the social structure of a species is critical for understanding the overall evolution and behavioral ecology of that species. An individual’s social relationships have consequences that impact the movements, habitat use, and mate choice of other individuals, and collectively influence spatial patterns and gene flow in the population or species. My dissertation research focuses on the social structure of African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis) and tests for fission-fusion sociality, which has been detected in the other extant elephant species, the African savanna (L. africana) and Asian (Elephas maximus ) elephants. Observational studies at forest clearings have shown that African forest elephants have the smallest group sizes of the extant elephants, and are typically composed of an adult female and her dependent calves. However, associations may be more extensive because it is difficult to detect individuals that may be obscured by the dense forest vegetation. I used satellite telemetry, behavioral observations, non-invasive genetic sampling, and social networks to look for evidence of multi-tiered fission fusion sociality, in which an adult female and her dependent calves (tier one) form a “family group” with related adult females (tier two), that fuse into larger “bond groups” (tier three), and larger “clans” (tier four) of up to hundreds of elephants.;First, I describe satellite telemetry results from six adult female forest elephants in Loango National Park, Gabon. As home range overlap can provide indirect information about the social interactions between individuals, this study found small home ranges with low volume of intersection indices between individuals, indicating that the probability of co-occurrence between dyads of individuals in the same area is also low. This suggests spatial avoidance among these adult females, which contrasts with the patterns of family groups overlapping in home ranges within sub-populations in African savanna elephants.;Second, I used non-invasive genetic approaches to infer sociality from African forest elephants in Lopé National Park (LNP), Gabon. I found evidence of fine-scale genetic structure with individuals being more closely related to each other than expected by chance at distances of five kilometers or less. Through network models created by genotyping dung samples collected together at the same time, location, and of the same freshness, I found larger group sizes of forest elephants compared to those from observations alone and that groups largely consisted of individuals of the same mitochondrial DNA matriline. These results support evidence of higher order social structure including family groups (representing second tier relationships), and possibly even bond groups (third tier).;Finally, I tracked the relationships of known individuals and created social networks of adult females within LNP. Social networks revealed evidence of kin-based fission-fusion sociality with one large component of twenty-two adult females, followed by smaller ones of four. I observed many solitary females (females observed alone or only with dependent calves) throughout the study and few individuals had preferred associations. Although these results reveal that forest elephant females associate with other females in fission-fusion patterns, they frequently separate from them, and when preferred associations do form, it is typically with only one other individual.;When comparing these results with knowledge about the sociality of the other extant elephant species, they suggest that although there is evidence of kin-based fission-fusion sociality, African forest elephants differ from African and Asian elephants. Social networks from both African savanna and Asian elephants have more connected networks, and larger component sizes in networks. In contrast, forest elephant social networks and networks created from noninvasive genetic sampling had many small components and solitary individuals, few large components, and were disconnected.;Several ecological factors may contribute to the more limited sociality observed in forest elephants. Forest elephants have the most “closed” habitats of the three extant species, which may physically prevent larger aggregations. There also may be costs associated with foraging in larger groups, as patchily distributed resources such as fruits, on which forest elephants forage heavily, will quickly be depleted, resulting in increased travel for forage. Finally, large cooperatively hunting predators are currently absent in most locations throughout forest elephant range, negating the need for groups to form for defense against predators. Therefore, forest elephants may lack strong benefits associated with group-living and suffer from costs which may drive the type of fission-fusion patterns observed.
机译:识别物种的社会结构对于理解该物种的整体进化和行为生态至关重要。一个人的社会关系会影响其他人的运动,栖息地的使用以及他们的配偶选择,并共同影响种群或物种的空间格局和基因流动。我的论文研究的重点是非洲森林象(Loxodonta cyclotis)的社会结构,以及裂变融合社会性的测试,在其他现存的大象物种中,非洲大草原(L. africana)和亚洲(Elephas maximus)象中也发现了这种现象。 。对森林砍伐的观察研究表明,非洲森林象的现存象群最小,通常由成年雌性和其依赖的小牛组成。但是,关联可能会更加广泛,因为很难检测到可能被茂密的森林植被所遮盖的个体。我使用卫星遥测,行为观察,非侵入式基因采样和社交网络来寻找多层裂变融合社会性的证据,其中成年女性和她的家犊(一级)组成一个“家庭群体”,并与之相关。成年雌性(第二级),可以融合成最多多达数百头大象的更大的“结合群”(第三层)和更大的“氏族”(第四层)。首先,我描述了六只成年雌性森林象的卫星遥测结果。在加蓬Loango国家公园。由于家庭范围的重叠可以提供有关个体之间社会互动的间接信息,因此本研究发现个体范围较小的家庭范围内的交叉指数较低,这表明同一地区的个体二元组同时出现的可能性也较低。这表明这些成年雌性动物在空间上是回避的,这与非洲大草原大象亚种群内家庭范围内重叠的家庭群体的模式形成对比。第二,我使用非侵入性遗传方法从LopéNational的非洲森林大象中推断出社交性。加蓬公园(LNP)。我发现,在五公里或更短的距离内,个体相互之间的亲缘关系比预期的更紧密,这证明了遗传结构的精细化。通过对在同一时间,地点和相同新鲜度下收集的粪便样本进行基因分型而建立的网络模型,我发现与单独观察所得粪便相比,森林大象的种群更大,而这些种群主要由相同线粒体DNA母体的个体组成。这些结果支持了更高层次的社会结构的证据,包括家庭群体(代表第二层关系),甚至可能是债券群体(第三层关系)。最后,我跟踪了已知个体的关系并在LNP中创建了成年女性的社交网络。社交网络揭示了基于亲属的裂变融合社会的证据,其中有二十二成年女性中有很大一部分,其次是四分之一。在整个研究过程中,我观察到许多独居的雌性(单独观察或仅与依赖的犊牛观察到的雌性),很少有个体喜欢交往。尽管这些结果表明森林象的雌性以裂变融合的方式与其他雌性交往,但他们经常与它们分开,并且当形成偏好的交往时,通常只有一个人。;将这些结果与关于社会性的知识进行比较时在其他现存的大象物种中,他们认为,尽管有证据表明基于亲属的裂变融合社会性,但非洲森林象不同于非洲和亚洲象。来自非洲大草原和亚洲象的社交网络拥有更多的连接网络,并且网络中的组件更大。相比之下,森林象的社交网络和由非侵入性基因采样创建的网络具有许多小的组成部分和孤立的个体,很少的大组成部分,并且彼此断开。;几个生态因素可能导致森林象中观察到的社会性更加有限。森林大象是这三种现存物种中最“封闭”的栖息地,从物理上可能阻止较大的聚集。在较大的群体中觅食也可能会产生成本,因为诸如水果等零散分布的资源将使森林象大量觅食,而这些资源很快就会枯竭,导致觅食旅行增加。最后,在整个森林象范围内的大多数地方,目前都没有大型的合作捕食性掠食者,从而无需为防御掠食者而组建队伍。因此,森林象可能缺乏与群体生活相关的强大好处,并且遭受可能导致观察到的裂变融合模式类型增加的成本。

著录项

  • 作者

    Schuttler, Stephanie Grace.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Missouri - Columbia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Missouri - Columbia.;
  • 学科 Agriculture Wildlife Conservation.;Biology Ecology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 153 p.
  • 总页数 153
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:27

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号