首页> 外文学位 >Ecoviolence and the law (supranational normative foundations of ecocrime).
【24h】

Ecoviolence and the law (supranational normative foundations of ecocrime).

机译:生态暴力与法律(生态犯罪的超国家规范基础)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

After working for about ten years on environmental ethics, particularly on the meaning and the implications of ecological and biological integrity, I became convinced that its converse, ecological disintegrity should be viewed as an attack on life, a form of violence to natural systems' structure and function, hence, to all living things at the macro level, and an assault on human life, and on the natural function of human organisms at the micro level. Ongoing interaction with scientists, ecologists, biologists and epidemiologists informed my conclusions, eventually confirmed by a document produced by the WHO/ECEH Rome Office (Soskolne and Bertollini, 1999). This document, entitled "Ecological Integrity and Sustainable Development: Cornerstones of Public Health," brought into focus the work of several years of research and numerous publications, making explicit the connection between disintegrity including various forms of pollution, and its causes, such as hazardous industrial practices, and in general, the results of overconsumption and of the elimination of natural systems. It also emphasized the resulting fatalities, human morbidity, and the alteration, often irreversible, of natural human functions. In so doing, it was foundational for the argument I propose in this work: breaches of environmental regulations, whether domestic or international, are ultimately to be viewed as breaches of human rights law.; Assaults upon humans, whether perpetrated with bare hands or with other instruments of violence, are crimes. If the deprivation of necessary ecological integrity, either by encroachment and manipulation of the wild, or inquination and pollution of inhabited areas is a present and constant threat to human health and function, ultimately to human life, then that too is an assault, therefore a crime that must be viewed, treated, and punished accordingly. The fact that in present day legal infrastructure it is not so treated represents an additional moral "crime" in itself.
机译:在从事环境伦理工作约十年之后,尤其是在生态和生物完整性的含义及其含义方面,我变得坚信应将其反面的生态完整性视为对生命的攻击,是对自然系统结构的一种暴力形式因此,它在宏观上对所有生物都起着作用和作用,在微观上对人类的生命和对生物体的自然功能的攻击。与科学家,生态学家,生物学家和流行病学家的持续互动为我的结论提供了依据,最终得到了WHO / ECEH罗马办事处制作的一份文件的确认(Soskolne和Bertollini,1999)。这份题为“生态完整性与可持续发展:公共卫生的基石”的文件着重研究了数年的研究工作,并发表了许多出版物,明确指出了包括各种形式污染在内的廉洁性及其根源(如有害物质)之间的联系。工业惯例,通常是过度消费和消除自然系统的结果。它还强调了由此造成的死亡,人类发病率以及人类自然功能的改变,这些改变通常是不可逆的。这样做是我在这项工作中提出的论点的基础:违反环境法规,无论是国内的还是国际的,最终都应被视为违反人权法。袭击人类,无论是赤手空拳还是其他暴力手段,都是犯罪。如果由于侵占和操纵野生生物而剥夺了必要的生态完整性,或者对居民区的包容和污染,对人类健康和功能构成了持续不断的威胁,最终威胁到人类生命,那么这也是一种攻击,因此必须予以查看,对待和惩罚的犯罪。在当今的法律基础设施中,没有对其进行如此对待的事实本身就是一种额外的道德“犯罪”。

著录项

  • 作者

    Westra, Laura S.;

  • 作者单位

    York University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 York University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 847 p.
  • 总页数 847
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号