首页> 外文学位 >Recovering capital expenditures: The railroad industry paradox.
【24h】

Recovering capital expenditures: The railroad industry paradox.

机译:收回资本支出:铁路行业的悖论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Following deregulation in 1980, the U.S. freight railroad industry invested large amounts of capital, expanded output and increased earnings, but---paradoxically---it did not earn a competitive return on investment. As a result, investors became increasingly wary of expanding investment in this industry, even as demand for rail transportation services continued to grow. In recent years, investment has been constrained, capacity has become more restricted, prices have risen, and returns to investment have improved but continue to fall below the industry's cost of capital.; This research examines the possibility that railroad capital expenditures represent an incremental cost of traffic that was, and may continue to be, substantially underestimated in industry calculations of marginal cost. As a result, railroad pricing strategies may rely on overstated contribution ratios that do not consider the full incremental capital cost associated with each shipment. Because railroads invest more capital, as a percentage of revenue, than any other major industry sector, they are particularly vulnerable to such miscalculations. All variable costs (expenses and investments) must be included in marginal cost calculations if the economic value of the firm is to be maximized in the way it prices its goods and services.; This research combines engineering, economic, and financial methods and makes contributions in each area. Railroad maintenance strategies that rely more heavily on capital investment are more cost effective. Infrastructure capital spending is caused by current and future output, and is therefore a short run marginal cost. Railroad marginal cost formulae appear to substantially underestimate the true incremental nature of ongoing capital expenditures. Regulatory average variable cost formulae do not incorporate variable capital expenditures suggesting that Surface Transportation Board estimates of revenue to variable cost are overstated, subjecting a larger share of rail traffic to potential economic regulation than would otherwise occur.
机译:在1980年放松管制之后,美国货运铁路行业投入了大量资本,扩大了产量并增加了收益,但是-令人反感的是-它没有获得有竞争力的投资回报。结果,即使对铁路运输服务的需求持续增长,投资者也越来越担心扩大对该行业的投资。近年来,投资受到限制,产能受到更大限制,价格上涨,投资回报率有所提高,但仍低于行业的资本成本。这项研究检验了铁路资本支出代表交通的增量成本的可能性,该成本在行业边际成本计算中曾经而且可能会被大大低估。结果,铁路定价策略可能依赖于夸大的贡献率,而没有考虑与每批货运相关的全部增量资本成本。由于铁路比其他任何主要工业部门投资的资本(占收入的百分比)都更多,因此它们尤其容易受到这种错误估计的影响。如果要以其商品和服务定价的方式最大化公司的经济价值,则所有可变成本(费用和投资)都必须包括在边际成本计算中。这项研究结合了工程,经济和财务方法,并在每个领域做出了贡献。更加依赖资本投资的铁路维护策略更具成本效益。基础设施资本支出是由当前和未来的产出引起的,因此是短期的边际成本。铁路边际成本公式似乎大大低估了持续资本支出的真正增量性质。监管部门的平均可变成本公式未包含可变资本支出,这表明地面运输委员会对可变成本的收入估算被高估了,与潜在情况相比,铁路运输受到潜在经济监管的份额更大。

著录项

  • 作者

    Grimes, George Avery.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.; Economics Commerce-Business.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 266 p.
  • 总页数 266
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;贸易经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号