首页> 外文学位 >Partage d'infrastructures et convergence fixe/mobile dans les reseaux 3GPP de prochaine generation.
【24h】

Partage d'infrastructures et convergence fixe/mobile dans les reseaux 3GPP de prochaine generation.

机译:下一代3GPP网络中的基础设施共享和固定/移动融合。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In a first paper entitled "A Potential Evolution of the Policy and Charging Control/QoS Architecture for the 3GPP IETF-based Evolved Packet Core", FMC and Core Network (CN) sharing aspects are treated simultaneously because it is important that the logical PCC architecture reflects the realities of the industry trends described above.;Following the description of the trends in the communications industry were presented a list of four requirements that enable for a PCC architecture: service convergence (capacity to use a service from any type of access), CN sharing that allows several Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs) to coexist, the creation of local access network policies as well as efficient micro-mobility in roaming scenarios.;As a second step, two NGN architectures were evaluated upon the requirements mentioned above. This evaluation concluded that a hybrid solution (based on the key features of each architecture but without their respective drawbacks) would offer a very promising foundation for a complete solution.;The proposed solution achieved its goal with a clearer separation of the business roles (e.g., access and network providers) and the introduction of a Network Policy Function (NPF) for the management of the CN. Indeed, the business roles that were defined allow the creation of distinct policy/QoS and administrative domains. The roles become mandatory in infrastructure sharing scenarios. Otherwise, they maintain the compatibility with the actual vertically-integrated operator model; the latter then plays all of the business roles.;Introducing the NPF into the CN enables the CN policy management to be separated from policy management related to subscribers, services and access networks. Additionally, the NPF allows the CN to be shared by multiple Network Service Providers (NSPs) and respect the Service Level Agreements (SLAs) that link the IP Aggregation Network (IPAN) to the NSPs, as well as those that tie the IPAN to the Access Network Providers (ANPs).;A second paper entitled "A Network Policy Function Node for a Potential Evolution of the 3GPP Evolved Packet Core" constitutes an extension of the first paper that extensively described the industry trends, two existing PCC architectures and their characteristics, and finally offered an overview of the proposed solution. On the other hand, the second paper thoroughly describes all of the impacts that the proposal has on the existing 3GPP PCC architecture. Indeed, a significant contribution of this second paper is that it provides an extensive list of potential simplifications that the proposed solution allows.;The main contribution of the second paper is that from now on the proposed solution can be deployed over an existing PCC architecture with a minimum of impacts. Indeed, a small modification to the NPF's reference points enables this enhancement. As a consequence, this enhancement provided a solution that is compatible with both PCC architecture variants, based on either GPRS Tunneling Protocol (GTP) or Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6).;A last contribution of the second paper is to demonstrate the NPF's internals when the former is controlling a an IPAN based on tunneling mechanisms such as Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) or Provider Backbone Bridge-Traffic Engineering (PBB-TE). A traffic engineering process allows traffic flow aggregates to pass around a congested node, to better balance the load between the network elements and make sure that the QoS requirements are respected at all times.;The third paper entitled "A MultiAccess Resource ReSerVation Protocol (MARSVP) for the 3GPP Evolved Packet System" deals with QoS provisioning in FMC scenarios, especially for applications that are not directly supported by the network. As an example, all peer-to-peer applications (such as online gaming) that represent a small fraction of the total peer-to-peer traffic or those that are new and relatively unknown. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).
机译:在标题为“基于3GPP IETF的演进分组核心的策略和计费控制/ QoS架构的潜在发展”的第一篇论文中,同时讨论了FMC和核心网(CN)共享方面,因为逻辑PCC架构很重要反映了上述行业趋势的现实。在对通信行业趋势的描述之后,列出了实现PCC体系结构的四个要求:服务融合(使用任何类型的访问服务的能力), CN共享,允许多个移动虚拟网络运营商(MVNO)并存,创建本地接入网络策略以及漫游场景中的高效微移动性。第二步,根据上述要求评估了两种NGN体系结构。评估得出的结论是,混合解决方案(基于每个体系结构的关键特性,但没有各自的缺点)将为完整解决方案提供非常有希望的基础。所提出的解决方案通过更清晰地分离业务角色(例如,访问和网络提供商),以及引入用于管理CN的网络策略功能(NPF)。实际上,定义的业务角色允许创建不同的策略/ QoS和管理域。在基础结构共享方案中,角色变得必不可少。否则,它们将保持与实际的垂直集成运营商模型的兼容性;将NPF引入到CN中可以使CN策略管理与与订户,服务和接入网络相关的策略管理分离。此外,NPF允许CN由多个网络服务提供商(NSP)共享,并遵守将IP聚合网络(IPAN)链接到NSP以及将IPAN绑定到NSP的那些服务级别协议(SLA)。接入网络提供商(ANP)。;第二篇名为“ 3GPP演进分组核心潜在演进的网络策略功能节点”的论文构成了第一篇论文的扩展,该论文广泛描述了行业趋势,两种现有PCC体系结构及其特性,最后提供了建议的解决方案的概述。另一方面,第二篇论文彻底描述了该提案对现有3GPP PCC体系结构的所有影响。的确,第二篇论文的重要贡献在于,它提供了所提出的解决方案所允许的大量潜在简化方法。第二篇论文的主要贡献在于,从现在开始,所提出的解决方案可以在现有的PCC体系结构上进行部署,并且最小的影响。的确,对NPF参考点进行少量修改即可实现此增强功能。因此,此增强功能提供了一种基于GPRS隧道协议(GTP)或代理移动IPv6(PMIPv6)的与两种PCC体系结构版本兼容的解决方案。第二篇论文的最后一个贡献是,演示了NPF的内部结构前者基于诸如多协议标签交换(MPLS)或提供商骨干网桥流量工程(PBB-TE)之类的隧道机制控制IPAN。流量工程流程允许流量聚集在拥塞的节点周围通过,以更好地平衡网络元素之间的负载,并确保始终满足QoS要求。第三篇题为“多路访问资源保留协议(MARSVP)”的论文)(针对3GPP演进分组系统)在FMC场景中处理QoS设置,尤其是对于网络不直接支持的应用。例如,所有对等应用程序(例如在线游戏)仅占对等业务总量的一小部分,或者是新的且相对未知的应用程序。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ouellette, Stephane.;

  • 作者单位

    Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal (Canada).;
  • 学科 Engineering Electronics and Electrical.;Information Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 126 p.
  • 总页数 126
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号