首页> 外文学位 >Beliefs about item memorability affect metacognitive control in item-method directed forgetting.
【24h】

Beliefs about item memorability affect metacognitive control in item-method directed forgetting.

机译:关于项目记忆力的信念会影响项目方法指导的遗忘中的元认知控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Across six experiments, I examined the role of metacognitive control in item-method directed forgetting. In Experiment 1, participants studied loud and quiet items, which were subsequently cued as to-be-remembered (TBR) or to-be-forgotten (TBF). Typically, the volume of stimuli does not influence recall, although loud items are judged as more memorable than quiet items (Rhodes & Castel, 2009). In contrast, there was a unique recall advantage for loud TBR items when participants engaged in directed forgetting. Giving participants extra opportunities to engage rehearsal does not produce the selective advantage for loud items (Experiment 2), nor does emphasizing the importance of some items over others (Experiments 3 and 4). Experiment 5 manipulated the encoding fluency of the stimuli using a font type manipulation, which did not produce recall differences between the fluently and less fluently processed items despite the effect of font type on judgments of learning. Finally, Experiment 6 investigated participants' beliefs about what helps them disengage from TBF items and what helps them retain TBR items. Specifically, after TBF or TBR items, participants were told to select earlier studied line drawings that varied both in perceptual size (small vs. large size image) and conceptual size (drawing of a small vs. large object in real life). I propose two mechanisms to explain the results. According to the rehearsal strategy mechanism, people use beliefs about item memorability to selectively rehearse certain items as a way to forget other items. According to the salience mechanism, people are drawn to perceptually salient stimuli when performing directed forgetting.
机译:在六个实验中,我研究了元认知控制在项目方法指导的遗忘中的作用。在实验1中,参与者研究了吵闹而安静的物品,这些物品随后被提示为“被记住”(TBR)或“被遗忘”(TBF)。通常,刺激的音量不会影响回忆,尽管大声的物品比安静的物品更令人难忘(Rhodes&Castel,2009)。相反,当参与者进行定向遗忘时,响亮的TBR物品具有独特的召回优势。给参与者更多的参与彩排的机会既不会产生响亮项目的选择性优势(实验2),也不会强调某些项目相对于其他项目的重要性(实验3和4)。实验5使用字体类型操作来控制刺激的编码流畅性,尽管字体类型对学习判断有影响,但在流畅和不太流畅处理的项目之间没有产生回忆回忆差异。最后,实验6调查了参与者关于什么有助于他们脱离TBF项目以及如何帮助他们保留TBR项目的信念。具体来说,在TBF或TBR项目之后,要求参与者选择较早研究的线图,这些线图的感知尺寸(小尺寸图像与大尺寸图像)和概念尺寸(现实生活中小尺寸物体与大尺寸物体)的变化都不同。我提出两种解释结果的机制。根据排练策略机制,人们使用关于项目记忆性的信念来选择性地排练某些项目,以作为忘记其他项目的一种方式。根据显着机制,人们在进行定向遗忘时会受到感知上显着的刺激。

著录项

  • 作者

    Foster, Nathaniel L.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.;
  • 学科 Psychology General.;Psychology Cognitive.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 108 p.
  • 总页数 108
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号