首页> 外文学位 >The utility of the Level of Service/Risk-Need-Responsivity (LS/RNR) instrument in predicting recidivism for adult mentally ill offenders involved in a mental health court
【24h】

The utility of the Level of Service/Risk-Need-Responsivity (LS/RNR) instrument in predicting recidivism for adult mentally ill offenders involved in a mental health court

机译:服务水平/风险需要响应度(LS / RNR)仪器在预测参与精神卫生法院的成年精神病患者的再犯中的实用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This research examined the predictive validity the Level of Service/Risk-Need-Responsivity (LS/RNR) instrument for recidivism in 138 male and female mentally ill offenders involved with a mental health court (MHC). Overall, the sample was medium-risk (MLS/RNR = 17.06) and had a general recidivism rate of 47.8%. The General Risk/Need section of this instrument strongly predicted general (AUC = .77) and technical (AUC = .75) recidivism, while the Specific Risk/Need section most accurately predicted violent recidivism (AUC = .65). No LS/RNR section had incremental validity beyond the General Risk/Need section for general and technical recidivism, but only the Specific Risk/Need section significantly explained variance for violent outcomes. Criminogenic needs were differentially predictive across gender and diagnostic groups. Recommendations for future research include expansion of the Specific Risk/Need item content to include variables that inform short-term violence risk. It was also argued that integration of formal risk assessment procedures into MHC programs is critical to inform decision-making regarding the admission and case management of offenders with mental illness. This assessment should use the full LS/RNR rather than consideration of the General Risk/Need section only, especially for the prediction of violent recidivism.
机译:这项研究检查了心理健康法院(MHC)涉及的138名男女精神病患者的累犯服务/风险需要反应水平(LS / RNR)工具的预测有效性。总体而言,该样本属于中等风险(MLS / RNR = 17.06),总体累犯率为47.8%。该工具的“一般风险/需求”部分强烈预测了普遍(AUC = .77)和技术性(AUC = .75)再次犯罪,而“特殊风险/需求”部分最准确地预测了暴力再犯(AUC = .65)。对于一般和技术累犯,没有LS / RNR部分具有超出“一般风险/需求”部分的递增效度,但只有“特殊风险/需求”部分可以有效解释暴力结果的差异。性别和诊断人群对致犯罪的需要有不同的预测。对未来研究的建议包括扩展“特定风险/需要”项目的内容,以包括告知短期暴力风险的变量。也有人认为,将正式的风险评估程序纳入MHC计划对于为有关精神疾病罪犯的入院和病例管理提供决策至关重要。该评估应使用完整的LS / RNR,而不是仅考虑“一般风险/需求”部分,尤其是对于暴力累犯的预测而言。

著录项

  • 作者

    Canales, Donaldo David.;

  • 作者单位

    University of New Brunswick (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of New Brunswick (Canada).;
  • 学科 Mental health.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 174 p.
  • 总页数 174
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:11

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号