首页> 外文学位 >Literary Philanthropy: The Pulitzer Prize, Oprah's Book Club, and Contemporary U.S. Fiction.
【24h】

Literary Philanthropy: The Pulitzer Prize, Oprah's Book Club, and Contemporary U.S. Fiction.

机译:文学慈善事业:普利策奖,奥普拉图书俱乐部和当代美国小说。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation examines how the logic of institutional philanthropy shapes the field of contemporary literature. I focus on the Pulitzer Prize and Oprah's Book Club because they reflect the two dominant strains of contemporary social philanthropy. The Pulitzer Prize is rooted in Progressive Era rationalism, a traditional mode of foundation philanthropy that aims to manage contradictions between cultural and economic values by coupling disinterested reflection to procedural bureaucracy. This long-dominant institutional logic has been complemented in recent years by an increasingly popular strain of so-called "philanthrocapitalism," whose impact on the literary field is most strikingly evident in Oprah's Book Club. This second strain of literary philanthropy seeks to resolve conflicts not by managing and coordinating relatively distinct spheres of cultural and economic value, but rather by revealing these values' fundamental, underlying identity: for Oprah, it is not simply that philanthropic institutions can help literature thrive within capitalist markets; rather, the moral, aesthetic, and spiritual values fostered by literature are essential for bringing about truly enduring economic prosperity.;My dissertation contributes to the recent "institutional turn" in literary studies in two significant ways: first, the focus on philanthropy highlights important ethical and aesthetic dimensions of literature that are too often left behind in more sociologically-oriented analyses; and second, I place close textual analysis at the center of my investigation, drawing attention to how individual literary works formulate their own interrogations of the institutional logics that help shape their conditions of production. In my readings of prize-winning and book club-selected novels by Norman Mailer, Marilynne Robinson, Toni Morrison, and Jonathan Franzen, I find self-reflexive explorations of these novels' own implication within the social-philanthropic literary field. Each one expresses in its own way the struggle for literary autonomy amidst this field. Although the philanthropic endeavors of the Pulitzer and Oprah both aim to overcome tensions between cultural and economic values, these novels insist on a set of intractable contradictions at the core of the literary-philanthropic enterprise.
机译:本文研究了制度慈善的逻辑如何塑造当代文学领域。我专注于普利策奖和奥普拉读书俱乐部,因为它们反映了当代社会慈善事业的两个主要方面。普利策奖源于进步主义时代的理性主义,这是一种传统的基金会慈善模式,旨在通过将无私的反思与程序官僚主义相结合来管理文化与经济价值之间的矛盾。近年来,这种长期占主导地位的制度逻辑得到了越来越流行的所谓“慈善资本主义”的补充,在奥普拉的读书俱乐部中,其对文学领域的影响尤为明显。第二种文学慈善事业的目的不是通过管理和协调相对不同的文化和经济价值领域来解决冲突,而是通过揭示这些价值观的根本性,根本性特征:对于奥普拉而言,慈善机构不仅可以帮助文学蓬勃发展在资本主义市场内;相反,文学所培育的道德,审美和精神价值对于实现真正持久的经济繁荣至关重要。我的论文以两种重要方式对最近的文学研究“体制转向”做出了贡献:第一,对慈善事业的关注强调了重要的意义。文学的伦理和美学层面,在以社会学为导向的分析中常常被遗忘;其次,我将严密的文本分析放在调查的中心,提请人们注意个人文学作品是如何对制度逻辑提出自己的质疑的,这些制度逻辑有助于塑造其生产条件。在阅读诺曼·梅勒(Norman Mailer),玛丽莲·鲁滨逊(Marilynne Robinson),托尼·莫里森(Toni Morrison)和乔纳森·弗兰森(Jonathan Franzen)的获奖小说和书籍俱乐部精选小说时,我发现这些小说在社会慈善文学领域中的意义进行了自我反思。每个人都以自己的方式表达在这一领域内为文学自治而进行的斗争。尽管普利策和奥普拉的慈善事业都旨在克服文化和经济价值观念之间的紧张关系,但这些小说坚持在文学慈善事业的核心上存在一系列棘手的矛盾。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wensink, Joseph.;

  • 作者单位

    Brandeis University.;

  • 授予单位 Brandeis University.;
  • 学科 Literature Modern.;Literature American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 335 p.
  • 总页数 335
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号