首页> 外文学位 >Shakespeare's Political Zoology: Creature Life and the Rise of Constituent Power.
【24h】

Shakespeare's Political Zoology: Creature Life and the Rise of Constituent Power.

机译:莎士比亚的政治动物学:生物生活和制宪权的崛起。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The collision of human life, creature life, and popular sovereignty in Shakespeare's work is what I call Political Zoology in this dissertation. During the English Renaissance there was some overlap between political discourse and the studies of creatures, serpents, birds, and insects. Some of the political ideologies that were reflected in Renaissance bestiaries expressed views that gave common "lesser" creatures unique sovereignty over the most powerful creatures, like lions and men, which mirrored some of the language present in Protestant resistant texts. The first chapter of this dissertation lays the historical and theoretical groundwork for a politics of constituent power through the writings of Protestant Reformers, Thomist Counter Reformists, and contemporary political philosophers. The second chapter puts these political ideas in conversation with creature discourse in A Midsummer Night's Dream. The ass-headed Nick Bottom is the rude mechanical and common hybrid beast that flips the body politic on its head (or rather its ass), and makes creaturely commonness an unexpected sovereign force in the play. The third chapter examines the discourse of creature rights in As You Like It, which serves as a critique of the monarchy's claim to sovereign ownership over certain natural territories, and it also complicates the interpretation of Genesis that gives men absolute dominion over creatures. My fourth chapter examines the power of sovereign speech in Hamlet. The "dying voice," or the right of the king to appoint his successor is left in the hands of Horatio, effectively giving the most significant sovereign right to someone who is not part of the royal family. This dissertation concludes with an epilogue on Renaissance accounts of the electoral sovereignty of a special class lesser creatures: bees. By proposing a notion of political zoology that coheres through Renaissance political texts, early zoological investigations, a trifecta of Shakespeare's plays, contemporary theories of biopolitics, and recent ecocriticism, I aim to contribute to the current discussion on animal studies and politics in Shakespeare.
机译:莎士比亚作品中人类生命,生物生命与普遍主权的碰撞是本文所称的政治动物学。在英国文艺复兴时期,政治话语与对生物,蛇,鸟和昆虫的研究之间存在一些重叠。文艺复兴时期的兽人所反映的一些政治意识形态表达了这样的观点,即普通的“次要”生物相对于狮子和人类等最强大的生物具有独特的主权,这反映了新教抵抗文本中的某些语言。本文的第一章通过新教改革家,托马斯反改革派和当代政治哲学家的著作,为组成权力政治奠定了历史和理论基础。第二章将这些政治思想与《仲夏夜之梦》中的生物话语进行对话。驴头尼克·巴托姆(Nick Bottom)是一种粗鲁的机械动物,是普通的混合野兽,它使身体(或更确切地说是其屁股)的头部翻转政治,并使生物共性成为戏剧中意想不到的主权力量。第三章考察了《如你所愿》中有关生物权的论述,该论点批评了君主制对某些自然领土拥有主权的主张,并使《创世纪》的解释复杂化,使人们对生物具有绝对的统治权。我的第四章探讨了《哈姆雷特》中主权言论的力量。国王的“垂死之声”或任命他的继任人的权利留在了Horatio手中,实际上将最重要的主权权授予了不属于王室成员的人。本文以文艺复兴时期关于一种特殊的次要生物:蜜蜂的选举主权的结尾作为结尾。通过提出一种通过文艺复兴时期的政治文本,早期的生态学调查,莎士比亚的戏剧三部曲,当代的生物政治理论和最近的生态批评来融合的政治生态学概念,我旨在为莎士比亚有关动物研究和政治的当前讨论做出贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wong, Timothy Michael.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Irvine.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Irvine.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 223 p.
  • 总页数 223
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号