首页> 外文学位 >China's currency manipulation and Amercan job loss: How did we get here and what can be done to reverse this trend?
【24h】

China's currency manipulation and Amercan job loss: How did we get here and what can be done to reverse this trend?

机译:中国的货币操纵和美国的失业:我们如何来到这里,如何扭转这一趋势?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

China and the United States are very important trading partners. They have not agreed or every issue, but that hasn't gotten in the way of their trading relationship. There is one issue that could possibly derail their relationship; China's exchange rate. In 1994, China decided to go to a fixed exchange rate. The results of going to the fixed exchange rate for China have led to a multitude of changes between the two countries. China's exports to the United States began to increase dramatically after changing their monetary policy in 1994. The United States, at the same time, started to lose the market share in certain manufacturing areas and increase their trade deficit. The linkage between manufacturing jobs loss in America and China's fixed exchange seem to be linked.;I studied numerous Congressional Bills that were introduced in both the United States House of Representatives and United States Senate that dealt with offsetting the harmful cause of China's fixed exchange rate. I also read Treasury reports on currency exchange, along with both GAO and CRS reports on the topic. In addition to those publications, I read books, newspaper clippings, journals, and study papers on the topic at hand.;I was able to deduct from all of the various Government publications and academic publications that China's exchange rate was causing the American manufacturing sector to loss more jobs due to the unfair advantage in making their exports much cheaper. It was also clear that the American manufacturing sector had been losing jobs before China started to manipulate their currency. The U.S. Treasury Department has taken a quiet approach in trying to get China's exchange rate to be more market-based. On the other hand, the U.S. House and Senate have been vocal in their opposition of China's currency exchange rate.;In conclusion, the problems that exist between China and the United States because of the exchange rate will not be going away anytime soon. The Treasury Department or the U.S. Congress can label China as a "manipulator", but China must act. The reasoning behind their shift to a fixed exchange rate was to give them a trading advantage by making exports cheaper and imports more expensive. If China believes that by allowing their currency to appreciate, and continue to grow economically, then they will do that. Ultimately though, they are the deciders.
机译:中美是非常重要的贸易伙伴。他们尚未达成共识或达成每一个问题,但这并未妨碍他们之间的贸易关系。有一个问题可能会破坏他们的关系。中国的汇率。 1994年,中国决定采用固定汇率。中国采用固定汇率的结果导致两国之间发生了许多变化。 1994年中国改变货币政策后,中国对美国的出口开始急剧增长。与此同时,美国开始失去某些制造业领域的市场份额,并增加了贸易逆差。美国的制造业工作机会流失与中国的固定汇率之间的联系似乎是相互联系的。我研究了在美国众议院和美国参议院中提出的旨在抵消中国固定汇率的有害原因的众多国会法案。 。我还阅读了有关货币兑换的美国财政部报告,以及有关该主题的GAO和CRS报告。除了这些出版物,我还阅读了有关当前主题的书籍,报纸剪报,期刊和研究论文。我能够从所有各种政府出版物和学术出版物中推断出中国的汇率正在造成美国制造业的发展。由于不公平的优势使他们的出口便宜得多而失去更多工作。同样清楚的是,在中国开始操纵人民币汇率之前,美国制造业一直在失业。美国财政部采取了一种安静的方法,试图使中国的汇率更加基于市场。另一方面,美国众议院和参议院一直反对中国的货币汇率。总而言之,由于汇率问题,中美之间存在的问题不会很快消失。财政部或美国国会可以将中国标记为“操纵者”,但中国必须采取行动。他们转向固定汇率背后的原因是,通过使出口价格更便宜而进口价格更高,使它们具有贸易优势。如果中国相信通过允许人民币升值并继续经济增长,他们将做到这一点。最终,他们是决定者。

著录项

  • 作者

    Berger, Michael Nelson.;

  • 作者单位

    Georgetown University.;

  • 授予单位 Georgetown University.;
  • 学科 Economics General.;Economics Labor.;Political Science International Relations.
  • 学位 M.A.L.S.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 93 p.
  • 总页数 93
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:11

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号