首页> 外文学位 >Evaluation of Ecolabelling Criteria Using Life Cycle Assessment.
【24h】

Evaluation of Ecolabelling Criteria Using Life Cycle Assessment.

机译:使用生命周期评估评估生态标签标准。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Ecolabels are the main driving force of consumer knowledge in the realm of sustainable product purchasing. While ecolabels strive to improve consumer's purchasing decisions, they have overwhelmed the market, leaving consumers confused and distrustful of what each label means. This study attempts to validate and understand environmental concerns commonly found in ecolabel criteria and the implications they have within the life cycle of a product. A life cycle assessment (LCA) case study of cosmetic products is used in comparison with current ecolabel program criteria to assess whether or not ecolabels are effectively driving environmental improvements in high impact areas throughout the life cycle of a product. Focus is placed on determining the general issues addressed by ecolabelling criteria and how these issues relate to hotspots derived through a practiced scientific methodology. Through this analysis, it was determined that a majority the top performing supply chain environmental impacts are covered, in some fashion, within ecolabelling criteria, but some, such as agricultural land occupation, are covered to a lesser extent or not at all. Additional criteria are suggested to fill the gaps found in ecolabelling programs and better address the environmental impacts most pertinent to the supply chain. Ecolabels have also been found to have a broader coverage then what can currently be addressed using LCA. The results of this analysis have led to a set of recommendations for furthering the integration between ecolabels and life cycle tools.
机译:在可持续产品购买领域,生态标签是消费者知识的主要驱动力。尽管生态标签努力改善消费者的购买决策,但它们已经淹没了市场,使消费者感到困惑和不信任每种标签的含义。这项研究试图验证和理解生态标签标准中常见的环境问题及其在产品生命周期中的影响。将化妆品的生命周期评估(LCA)案例研究与当前的生态标签计划标准进行比较,以评估生态标签在整个产品生命周期中是否有效地推动了高影响区域的环境改善。重点放在确定生态标签标准解决的一般问题以及这些问题与通过实践的科学方法得出的热点之间的关系。通过该分析,可以确定,在生态标签标准内以某种方式涵盖了大多数表现最佳的供应链环境影响,而在某些程度上(例如农业用地)则涵盖得很少或根本没有涵盖。建议采用其他标准来填补生态标签计划中的空白,并更好地解决与供应链最相关的环境影响。人们发现,生态标签的覆盖范围比目前使用LCA可以解决的范围更广。分析结果提出了一系列建议,以促进生态标签与生命周期工具之间的整合。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bernardo, Melissa.;

  • 作者单位

    Arizona State University.;

  • 授予单位 Arizona State University.;
  • 学科 Environmental Management.;Engineering Environmental.;Sustainability.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 92 p.
  • 总页数 92
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号