首页> 外文学位 >Participatory Satire? Political Humor, the Colbert Super PAC Project, and the Colliding Worlds of Late Night Comedy and Modern American Politics.
【24h】

Participatory Satire? Political Humor, the Colbert Super PAC Project, and the Colliding Worlds of Late Night Comedy and Modern American Politics.

机译:参与式的满足感?政治幽默,科尔伯特超级PAC项目以及深夜喜剧与现代美国政治的碰撞世界。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Late night humor and satire is playing an increasingly significant role within our culture and political landscape. Most recently, comedians Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart have gone beyond the role satirists traditionally have played in skewering and making fun of politics -- and instead have started becoming prominent participants and activists within the political process itself. This dissertation closely examines the developments of the Colbert Super PAC project and investigates how Colbert's efforts have transformed the traditional role of political satire into something new and unique within the American political landscape. The research examines this phenomenon to gain an understanding of the motives and intent behind the Colbert Super PAC, as well as perceptions and understanding of this "participatory satire" among those within the journalism and campaign finance reform communities. Additionally the perspectives of several leading campaign election law experts are explored, along with analysis of media coverage focused on the Colbert Super PAC effort. Along with connections to existing theories within mass communication and political psychology, potential implications for this unique form of political humor within our democracy and future national political debates are discussed.
机译:深夜的幽默和讽刺在我们的文化和政治环境中发挥着越来越重要的作用。最近,喜剧演员斯蒂芬·科尔伯特(Stephen Colbert)和乔恩·斯图尔特(Jon Stewart)超越了讽刺作家传统上在编舞和取笑政治中所扮演的角色-取而代之的是开始成为政治进程本身的杰出参与者和活动家。本文仔细研究了科尔伯特超级PAC项目的发展情况,并研究了科尔伯特的努力如何将政治讽刺的传统角色转变为美国政治环境中的新事物和独特事物。该研究对这种现象进行了研究,以了解科尔伯特超级PAC背后的动机和意图,以及对新闻业和竞选金融改革界人士这种“参与式讽刺”的理解和理解。此外,还探讨了几位领先的竞选法律专家的观点,以及针对科尔伯特超级PAC工作的媒体报道分析。除了与大众传播和政治心理学中现有理论的联系之外,还讨论了这种民主形式在我们的民主体系中以及未来的国家政治辩论中的潜在含义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gilkerson, Nathan David.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Mass Communications.;Psychology Social.;American Studies.;Political Science General.;Journalism.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 273 p.
  • 总页数 273
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号