首页> 外文学位 >The effects of clearcutting, intensive site preparation, herbicide release and fertilization on surface water quantity and quality at the Alto Experimental Watersheds in east Texas.
【24h】

The effects of clearcutting, intensive site preparation, herbicide release and fertilization on surface water quantity and quality at the Alto Experimental Watersheds in east Texas.

机译:得克萨斯州东部奥拓实验流域的整地,集约整地,除草剂释放和施肥对地表水水量和水质的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Nine small (2.5 ha) and four large (70-135 ha) watersheds were instrumented in 1999 in order to evaluate the effects of intensive silvicultural practices on water quality and quantity. Two treatments were evaluated: a conventional treatment involving clearcutting with herbicide site preparation, and a more intensive treatment that added subsoiling, fertilization, and a release herbicide application. After about three years of watershed calibration, harvest occurred in spring, 2002, with planting in December, 2002. First-year post-treatment response was measured on the treated watersheds. Small watershed effects were contrasted with the results from a similar water quality study on the same watersheds in 1981, in which two combinations of harvesting and mechanical site preparation without BMPs were evaluated.; Total storm runoff increase ranged from 0.94 to 13.73 cm in 2003 on all six small watersheds following harvest due to the reduction in evapotranspirational demand. Runoff increases were not statistically significant on the large watersheds. Total first-year sediment loss was significantly greater on two of the conventionals (SW2 and SW9) and one of the intensives (SW6). The greatest first-year increase of 540.1 kg/ha observed in 2003 was measured on SW6. This value was still only one-fifth of that observed from shearing and windrowing in 1981 without BMPs. First-year sediment loss was significantly greater on the intensive large watershed following harvest, but not on the conventional large watershed. Fertilization resulted in increased losses of nitrogen and phosphorus, but total annual loss rates were very low and only accounted for a small percentage of the applied nutrient. Herbicide concentrations peaked immediately after application and fell below the detection limit of 1 ppb within 6-9 months of application. Peak concentrations were several orders of magnitude below LD50 values. These data suggest that intensive silvicultural practices with BMPs do not significantly impair water quality.
机译:1999年,对9个小流域(2.5公顷)和四个大流域(70-135公顷)进行了测量,以评估集约化造林实践对水质和水量的影响。评估了两种处理方法:一种常规方法,包括使用除草剂位点进行整地,另一种是强化处理,增加了深松,施肥和释放除草剂的作用。经过约三年的分水岭校准后,收获于2002年春季开始,并于2002年12月开始种植。对处理后的分水岭的第一年后处理响应进行了测量。小流域影响与1981年在同一流域进行的类似水质研究的结果形成了鲜明对比,在该研究中,对没有BMP的收获和机械现场准备的两种组合进行了评估。由于蒸发蒸腾需求的减少,2003年收获后所有六个小流域的总暴雨径流量增加范围为0.94至13.73厘米。在大流域,径流量的增加没有统计学意义。在两种常规方法(SW2和SW9)和一种强化方法(SW6)中,第一年的沉积物总损失明显更大。在SW6上测得的2003年第一年最大增幅为540.1 kg / ha。该值仍仅为1981年没有BMP的剪切和割晒所观察到的值的五分之一。集约后的集约大流域的第一年沉积物损失明显更大,而常规大流域则没有。施肥导致氮和磷的损失增加,但每年的总损失率非常低,仅占所施用养分的一小部分。除草剂浓度在施用后立即达到峰值,并在施用后6-9个月内降至检测限1 ppb以下。峰值浓度比LD50值低几个数量级。这些数据表明,采用BMP进行密集的造林实践不会明显损害水质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号