首页> 外文学位 >'Living and Struggling on the Margins': A Post-Relocation History of the Zimbabwean Tonga's Livelihoods in Binga District, 1950s to 2009.
【24h】

'Living and Struggling on the Margins': A Post-Relocation History of the Zimbabwean Tonga's Livelihoods in Binga District, 1950s to 2009.

机译:“在边缘生活和挣扎”:津巴布韦汤加在宾加区的生计的迁居后历史,1950到2009年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation, I focus on the Zimbabwean Tonga people's livelihoods after their displacement from the Zambezi River plains to the adjacent arid uplands, the lusaka, due to the construction of the Kariba Dam in the late 1950s. Exposure to the lusaka's unfamiliar regime of state centered ownership of wildlife changed the Tonga's relationships to local natural resources. What they understood to be ordinary fishing and hunting while living under the minimal gaze of the colonial state by the Zambezi became poaching punishable by the state in the uplands. My central argument is that the Tonga experienced double displacement through the Kariba Dam induced relocations to the uplands. This means that the Tonga experienced physical dislocation from the Zambezi River plains followed by social and economic displacement in situ through state regulated exclusions from livelihood improving opportunities of exploiting the uplands' wildlife and areas with fertile soils as well as the fishery and waters of Lake Kariba. Due to unequal power relations at nation state level, 'outsiders' such as whites, Shonas and Ndebeles also dominated in the exploitation of the local natural resource assemblage. In advancing this argument I seek to underscore that displacement is not a simple and linear occurrence. It is a complex process whose dimensions change over time depending on emerging social, political and economic developments. Besides unpacking the diverse power structures and ways through which the Tonga were excluded from accessing local natural resources, I also seek to reorient discourses on Zimbabwe's natural resource debates. The Tonga ethnic minority's experiences of exclusion from accessing Binga District's diverse natural resources of land, water and wildlife expose the limits of the hegemonic articulations of the country's natural resource question. This is largely viewed through the narrow prism of racialized colonial land dispossessions by Europeans followed by post-colonial African repossessions. This dissertation draws on the Tonga's oral renditions and subjective interpretations of their livelihoods; archival sources; and policy documents to construct a detailed view of the interior world of their everyday household and communal efforts for accessing the artificially scarce local resources of land, water and wildlife.
机译:在这篇论文中,由于1950年代后期修建了卡里巴大坝,我将津巴布韦汤加人的生活从赞比西河平原转移到邻近的干旱高地卢萨卡后,我们将其重点放在这方面。卢萨卡州对以国家为中心的野生动植物所有权的陌生制度的曝光改变了汤加与当地自然资源的关系。他们将其理解为普通的捕鱼和狩猎,而生活在赞比西河对殖民地国家的最低关注之下,却被国家在高地上进行偷猎。我的中心论点是,汤加因卡里巴大坝导致的重新安置而经历了两次位移。这意味着汤加经历了赞比西河平原的自然流离失所,随后由于国家对生活的限制而排除了当地的社会和经济流失,改善了开发高地野生生物和肥沃土壤以及卡里巴湖渔业和水域的机会。由于国家与国家之间的权力关系不平等,白人,肖纳斯人和恩德贝雷斯人等“局外人”在当地自然资源组合的开发中也占主导地位。在提出这一论点时,我试图强调,位移不是简单而线性的现象。这是一个复杂的过程,其规模会随着新出现的社会,政治和经济发展而随着时间而变化。除了解开汤加无法获得当地自然资源的各种权力结构和方式之外,我还试图重新定位关于津巴布韦自然资源辩论的论述。汤加少数民族被排除在使用宾加区各种自然资源的土地,水和野生动植物之外的经验,暴露了该国自然资源问题的霸权主义表达方式的局限性。这在很大程度上是通过欧洲人对殖民化的土地进行种族化处理的狭窄棱镜来进行的,然后再进行对后殖民地非洲的剥夺。本文借鉴了汤加的口头表达和对其生计的主观解释。档案来源;和政策文件,以详细了解他们日常家庭的内部世界以及为获取人为稀缺的本地土地,水和野生动植物资源所做的公共努力。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 History African.;Sub Saharan Africa Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 353 p.
  • 总页数 353
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号