首页> 外文学位 >Effects of learning style and interaction on satisfaction of community college online learners.
【24h】

Effects of learning style and interaction on satisfaction of community college online learners.

机译:学习方式和互动对社区大学在线学习者满意度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Instructors, as they strive to provide the best online learning experience for their students, need to be aware how learning styles and course interaction levels influence student satisfaction. This study was to determine how learning styles and interaction both individually and together affect satisfaction in online courses.; Students in seven different online classes were directed to an online survey that consisted of three sections: learning style, level of interaction, and satisfaction. A modified Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Style Scales (GRSLSS) measured learning styles, and Roblyer's Rubric for Assessing Interactivity in Distance Courses measured interaction level. Satisfaction was measured by three questions worded to reflect characteristics of learning style, interaction level, or overall satisfaction.; Results of the analysis of student satisfaction based on learning styles showed that among the 6 learning styles, 3 showed significant associations with satisfaction. The avoidant learning style showed a negative association with satisfaction, while participant and collaborative learning styles showed a positive association. Participant and dependent were the most prevalent learning styles and avoidant was the least prevalent learning style.; Examination of student satisfaction based on level of interaction showed a positive association. Satisfaction increased as interaction levels rose. Perception of interaction level was then analyzed for each learning style. A negative association existed between interaction level and avoidant learning style, while positive associations existed between interaction level and participant and collaborative learning styles.; When investigating overall satisfaction based on learning styles and interaction level, the 6 learning styles were divided into high and low preference and interaction levels were divided into low, medium, and high levels. Overall satisfaction was ascertained for each category. In a surprising development, students who tested above the median in avoidant and independent learning styles preferred high interaction courses. In fact, students who tested above the median in all 6 different learning styles showed a preference for high interaction levels in courses (with one exception). Students who tested below the median in each learning style also showed a preference for high interaction courses.
机译:讲师在努力为学生提供最佳的在线学习体验时,需要意识到学习风格和课程互动水平如何影响学生的满意度。这项研究旨在确定学习方式和互动如何单独和共同影响在线课程的满意度。七个不同的在线课程的学生被定向到一个在线调查,该调查包括三个部分:学习风格,互动水平和满意度。修改后的Grasha-Riechmann学生学习风格量表(GRSLSS)用于测量学习风格,而Roblyer的“评估远程课程中的交互性”专栏则用于测量交互性水平。满意度是通过三个问题来衡量的,这些问题用词来反映学习风格,互动水平或整体满意度的特征。基于学习方式的学生满意度分析结果表明,在6种学习方式中,有3种与满意度之间存在显着相关性。回避型学习风格与满意度呈负相关,参与者和协作型学习风格呈正相关。参与者和依赖者是最普遍的学习方式,回避者是最不普遍的学习方式。基于互动水平的学生满意度测验显示出正相关。满意度随着互动程度的提高而增加。然后分析每种学习方式的互动水平。互动水平与回避学习风格之间存在负相关,互动水平与参与者和协作学习风格之间存在正相关。在根据学习方式和互动水平调查整体满意度时,将这6种学习方式分为高偏好和低偏好,互动程度分为低,中和高水平。确定每个类别的总体满意度。在一个令人惊讶的发展中,在回避和独立学习风格方面的测试高于中位数的学生偏爱高交互性课程。实际上,在所有6种不同的学习方式中测试均高于中位数的学生表现出对课程中较高交互水平的偏爱(一个例外)。在每种学习方式中测试低于中位数的学生也表现出对高互动课程的偏爱。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wiens, Joel H.;

  • 作者单位

    Pepperdine University.;

  • 授予单位 Pepperdine University.;
  • 学科 Education Community College.; Education Technology.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 109 p.
  • 总页数 109
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号