首页> 外文学位 >An investigation of lean blowout of gaseous fuel alternatives to natural gas.
【24h】

An investigation of lean blowout of gaseous fuel alternatives to natural gas.

机译:对天然气替代天然气的稀薄燃料的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This work examines lean premixed flame stability for multi-component fuel mixtures to support fuel flexibility for industrial combustors. A single Jet Stirred Reactor (JSR), a generic recirculation stabilized combustor, along with gaseous fuels of hydrogen, methane, and hydrogen/methane blends are chosen for the study. Experimental data on blowout are collected and a series of models are used to understand the mechanism of extinction in this recirculation-stabilized flame environment. By studying this more generic combustor, the aim is to develop generalizable results and methodologies for understanding and predicting lean blowout of multicomponent fuels.;In order to gain insight on the mechanism controlling blowout, two dimensional, axisymmetric computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations are carried out for the lean premixed combustion of both hydrogen and methane as the fuel. The fuel flow rate is reduced until the CFD model no longer produces a burning solution. Contour plots from the CFD model illustrate the evolution of the flow-field, temperature profiles, and flame structure within the JSR as blowout is approached for both fuels. The modeling suggests that lean blowout in the JSR does not occur in a spatially homogeneous condition, but rather under a zonal structure.;Two Chemical Reactor Network (CRN) models are developed using the flow field and reaction fields from the detailed CFD models in an attempt to capture the bulk of the physical processes responsible for flame stability. The single Plug Flow Reactor (PFR) model follows the concept of the hypothetical combusting fluid particle and assumes that only convective transport is responsible for stability.;A two PFR model is subsequently developed in which the core jet region (of constant mass flow) exchanges mass with the recirculation region through turbulent diffusive transport. Entrainment of flow by jet action is confined entirely to the recirculation region, represented by the exhaust of the recirculation PFR being convectively re-entrained at its entrance. The two PFR model performs about as well as the single PFR model in predicting blowout for hydrogen in the JSR and shows significant improvement over the single PFR model in both following the experimental data approaching blowout, and predicting the blowout condition for methane. In fact the two PFR model shows good agreement with both equivalence ratio and temperature at blowout across the full range of hydrogen/methane blends.;Regardless of the chemical mechanism applied, or whether we consider transport by convection only as in the single PFR model, or transport by both convection and diffusion as in the two PFR model, the story regarding the onset of blowout remains the same and is consistent with that given by CFD as well: the key to the stable operation of the reactor is the ignition event in the recirculation zone, resulting in the development of the radical pool. For pure hydrogen combustion as the fuel flow rate is reduced and the reactor moves towards blowout the destruction of the fuel slows and spreads, and the development of the radical pool moves further around the recirculation zone. The radical pool must develop (i.e. ignition must occur) before re-entrainment or the reactor will extinguish. For methane we similarly see the destruction of methane spread, and the net production of CO, and subsequently the net production of OH move further around the recirculation zone until the re-entrainment of radicals can no longer sustain the combustion. For methane, transport of the CO and radicals through turbulent diffusion appears to be a controlling process in this ignition event. The ignition event for hydrogen, on the other hand, is affected very little by the inclusion of diffusive transport of radicals. This is most likely due to the fact that the breakdown of hydrogen directly produces an H radical that feeds the chain propagating reaction, however the direct breakdown of methane has no such feedback. It is only in the destruction of methane intermediates that the H radical needed to feed the chain propagating reaction is produced. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).
机译:这项工作研究了多组分燃料混合物的稀薄预混火焰稳定性,以支持工业燃烧器的燃料灵活性。本研究选择了单个喷气搅拌反应器(JSR),通用的循环稳定燃烧器以及氢气,甲烷和氢气/甲烷混合物的气态燃料。收集了有关井喷的实验数据,并使用一系列模型来了解在这种再循环稳定火焰环境中的熄灭机理。通过研究这种更通用的燃烧器,目的是开发通用的结果和方法,以理解和预测多组分燃料的稀薄喷出。进行氢气和甲烷作为燃料的稀薄预混燃烧。降低燃料流量,直到CFD模型不再产生燃烧溶液为止。 CFD模型的等高线图说明了两种燃料都接近井喷时,JSR内流场,温度分布和火焰结构的演变。该模型表明,JSR中的稀薄井喷不是在空间均匀的条件下发生,而是在区域结构下发生。;在详细的CFD模型中使用流场和反应场开发了两个化学反应器网络(CRN)模型。试图捕获负责火焰稳定性的大部分物理过程。单一塞流反应器(PFR)模型遵循假设的燃烧流体颗粒的概念,并假设仅对流输运负责稳定作用;随后开发了两个PFR模型,其中(恒定质量流量的)中心射流区域交换通过湍流扩散传输与再循环区域形成质量。射流作用对流体的夹带完全限制在再循环区域,以再循环PFR的排气在其入口处对流地重新夹带为代表。在预测JSR中氢气的喷出量方面,两个PFR模型的性能与单个PFR模型大致相同,并且在遵循实验数据接近井喷和预测甲烷的喷出条件方面,均显示出比单个PFR模型有显着改进。实际上,两个PFR模型在整个氢气/甲烷混合物范围内的当量比和井喷温度都显示出良好的一致性。无论采用何种化学机理,或者我们是否仅像单个PFR模型那样考虑对流运输,或如两个PFR模型中那样通过对流和扩散进行运输,关于爆裂发生的故事仍然是相同的,并且与CFD给出的一致:反应堆稳定运行的关键是燃烧过程中的点火事件。回流区,导致自由基池的发展。对于纯氢燃烧,随着燃料流速的降低和反应堆向井喷的方向移动,燃料的破坏变慢并扩散,自由基池的形成进一步围绕再循环区域移动。自由基夹带必须在重新夹带之前形成(即必须点火),否则反应堆将熄灭。对于甲烷,我们类似地看到甲烷散布的破坏,CO的净生成量以及OH的净生成量进一步在再循环区域附近移动,直到自由基的再次夹带不再能够维持燃烧。对于甲烷,在这种点火事件中,CO和自由基通过湍流扩散的传输似乎是一个控制过程。另一方面,氢的点火事件几乎不受自由基扩散扩散的影响。这很可能是由于以下事实:氢的分解直接产生了一个氢自由基,该自由基供入链增长反应中,但是甲烷的直接分解没有这种反馈。仅在甲烷中间体的破坏中,产生进料链增长反应所需的H自由基。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Karalus, Megan.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 Engineering Mechanical.;Alternative Energy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 205 p.
  • 总页数 205
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号