首页> 外文学位 >Social Mobility under Three Regimes, China, 1645--2012.
【24h】

Social Mobility under Three Regimes, China, 1645--2012.

机译:三种政权下的社会流动性,中国,1645--2012。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Chapter 1. Social Mobility of China, 1645--2012: a Surname Study. This chapter estimates the rate of intergenerational social mobility in Late Imperial, Republican and Communist China by examining the changing social status of originally elite surnames over time. More specific, it identify surnames (or surname with particular places of origin) that are much more likely to show up among elites than among the general population during the initial period, and see how rapidly these surnames regress to its mediocrity. It finds much lower rates of mobility in all eras than previous studies have suggested, though there is some increase in mobility in the Republican and Communist eras. But even in the Communist era social mobility rates are much lower than are conventionally estimated for China, Scandinavia, the UK or USA. These findings are consistent with the findings of Campbell and Lee (2011) on the importance of kin networks in the intergenerational transmission of status. But it may reflect mainly a systematic tendency of conventional mobility studies to overestimate rates of social mobility.;Chapter 2. Social mobility of Taiwan, 1949--2012. This chapter estimates the social mobility of Taiwan after 1949, when the National Party of China was defeated in mainland China, and started to pursue social and economic policies different from those in mainland China. I trace the changing social status of "new mainlanders" who migrated to Taiwan as the ruling class around 1949. From 1957 population census, a group of 300 surnames were held by mainlanders with a proportion of 0.95 and above. 30 surnames were held by native Taiwanese with a proportion of 0.98 and above. I trace the relative status of these groups over time among top college students, doctors, and entrepreneurs. It shows that in Taiwan social mobility is slightly higher than in mainland China after 1949, but still much higher than conventional studies have suggested.;Chapter 3. Taiping rebellion as a diversity shock: The failure of public primary schooling in the Lower Yangzi of the Republican Era (1900--1949) . This chapter explores the differential impact of the Taiping rebellion (1851--1864) and consequent mass migration on 60 counties in the lower Yangzi region of China. In the first few decades of the twentieth century, traditional education was replaced by modern education and informal tutoring was replaced by formal schools. It finds that places were less successful in financing primary schooling if they experienced a greater diversity shock. A diversity shock made local population more diverse culturally, linguistically and even genetically after the rebellion relative to its pre-Taiping population, as measured by inconsistency in surname distribution. This result is robust to controlling for trends in population density, for geographic factors that correlated with influences from the Western world, access to the political center, and initial educational outcomes. Overall, in the lower Yangzi delta, the richest area of China, modern primary enrollment was below 30% during the Republic era. This is one reason why elites from the exam era persist into the Republic era, and hence why there was low social mobility before 1949.
机译:第一章,中国社会流动,1645--2012:姓氏研究。本章通过考察原始精英姓氏随时间变化的社会地位,来估计帝国末代,共和党和共产主义中国的代际社会流动速度。更具体地讲,它确定了在最初阶段,精英群体中比普通人群中更容易出现的姓氏(或具有特定起源地的姓氏),并观察了这些姓氏在多大程度上恢复了其平庸性。尽管共和党和共产主义时代的流动性有所增加,但它发现在所有时代中,流动性都比以前的研究要低得多。但是,即使在共产主义时代,社会流动率也远低于对中国,斯堪的纳维亚半岛,英国或美国的传统估计。这些发现与坎贝尔和李(Campbell and Lee,2011)关于亲缘网络在代际传承状态中的重要性的发现一致。但这可能主要反映了传统流动性研究的系统趋势,即高估了社会流动率。;第二章,台湾,1949--2012年。本章估算了1949年国民党在中国大陆被击败之后台湾的社会流动性,并开始奉行不同于中国大陆的社会和经济政策。我追溯了1949年左右移居台湾作为统治阶级的“新大陆人”的社会地位的变化。从1957年的人口普查起,大陆人持有300个姓氏,比例为0.95以上。台湾本地人拥有30个姓氏,比例为0.98以上。我追踪了这些群体随时间推移在顶尖大学生,医生和企业家中的相对地位。它表明,台湾的社会流动性在1949年之后略高于中国大陆,但仍远高于传统研究的建议。;第3章。太平天国叛乱是一种多样性冲击:长江下游的公立小学教育失败共和时代(1900--1949)。本章探讨了太平天国运动(1851--1864)的不同影响以及随之而来的大规模移民对中国扬子下游地区的60个县的影响。在二十世纪的前几十年中,传统教育被现代教育所取代,非正式补习被正规学校所取代。研究发现,如果地方遭受更大程度的多元化冲击,这些地方在资助初等教育方面将不太成功。叛乱后,相对于太平之前的人口,多样性冲击使当地居民在文化,语言甚至基因上更加多样化,这通过姓氏分布的不一致来衡量。这一结果对于控制人口密度的趋势,与西方世界的影响,进入政治中心的机会以及最初的教育成果相关的地理因素具有鲁棒性。总体而言,在中国最富裕的地区长江下游三角洲,民国时代的现代小学入学率低于30%。这就是为什么考试时代的精英人士一直坚持到共和国时代的原因,也是为什么1949年以前社会流动性低的原因之一。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hao, Yu.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Davis.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Davis.;
  • 学科 Economics.;Asian history.;Economic history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 141 p.
  • 总页数 141
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号