首页> 外文学位 >Lord, when did we see you? The ethical vision of white, progressive Baptists in the South during the civil rights movement.
【24h】

Lord, when did we see you? The ethical vision of white, progressive Baptists in the South during the civil rights movement.

机译:主啊,我们什么时候见到你的?民权运动期间南方白人进步浸信会的道德愿景。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For white, southern Christians, the civil rights movement was a dramatic public confrontation of their complicity with systemic injustice underwritten by spiritual complacency. Some had the ethical vision to see the societal problem racism posed; some did not. White Christians were reticent to act for social change, a reticence that amounted to preserving the status quo. As the historical distance from the civil rights movement increases, the multiple levels and nuance of white response to Jim Crow segregation is potentially lost in favor of simplistic narratives, leading to a binary and incomplete categorization of white involvement as that of either segregationist or activist. White, progressive Baptists, a rather small group, did not fall neatly within these categories and challenged the racial status quo of southern Christianity.;I examine the ethical vision of three moral exemplars, so as to glean the particular variables that shaped their character. My focus centers on itinerant activist, preacher and writer Will D. Campbell, one who eschewed institutional solutions to racism in favor of an individualistic approach. In contrast to Campbell, Southern Baptist ethicists, T.B. Maston and Henlee H. Barnette, sought to reform their respective seminaries and denomination through personal and systemic means.;Studying only individual responses, however, is inadequate given the complexity of societal problems like racism. Therefore, particular communities must also be examined due to the highly contextual nature of character formation. Of specific importance is how communities shape individuals who might even witness prophetically against dominant societal norms. Therefore, I examine theologically the ethos of the Southern Baptist-dominated South, during the civil rights movement era, so as to show how the courageous stances of those progressive Baptists were more noticeable given the deep racism endemic to their cultural and religious traditions. To explore these aims I utilize Glen Stassen and David Gushee's Holistic Character Ethics methodology, detailed in their work Kingdom Ethics.
机译:对于南方的白人基督徒而言,民权运动是公众对他们同谋与精神上的自满所支持的系统性不公正的戏剧性对抗。有些人具有伦理眼光,认为种族主义构成了社会问题。有些没有。白人基督徒不愿为社会变革而行动,这种沉默等于维护现状。随着距民权运动的历史距离增加,白人对吉姆·克劳(Jim Crow)种族隔离的反应的多重层次和细微差别可能会因偏爱简单的叙事而丢失,从而导致白人参与的二元性和不完全分类为种族隔离主义者或激进主义者。白人,进步的浸信会,是一个很小的团体,没有整齐地属于这些类别,并且对南方基督教的种族现状提出了挑战。我研究了三个道德榜样的伦理学视野,以便收集塑造其性格的特定变量。我的重点是巡回活动家,传教士和作家威尔·坎贝尔,他不赞成种族主义的制度化解决方案,而倾向于个人主义的方法。与南方浸信会伦理学家坎贝尔相反Maston和Henlee H. Barnette试图通过个人和系统的方式来改革他们各自的神学院和教派。但是,鉴于种族问题等社会问题的复杂性,仅研究个人的回答是不够的。因此,由于字符形成的高度上下文性质,还必须检查特定的社区。特别重要的是,社区如何塑造可能甚至在先知面前违背主流社会规范的个人。因此,在民权运动时期,我从神学角度考察了南部浸信会占主导地位的南部的精神,以表明那些进步的浸信会教士的勇气立场在其文化和宗教传统中普遍存在着深深的种族主义。为了探索这些目标,我利用格伦·斯塔森(Glen Stassen)和戴维·古西(David Gushee)的“整体性格伦理学”方法论,该方法在其《王国伦理学》中有详细介绍。

著录项

  • 作者

    Phillips, Justin Randall.;

  • 作者单位

    Fuller Theological Seminary, Center for Advanced Theological Study.;

  • 授予单位 Fuller Theological Seminary, Center for Advanced Theological Study.;
  • 学科 Religion History of.;Theology.;Ethics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 318 p.
  • 总页数 318
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号