首页> 外文学位 >Demystifying inter-country inequality: Data, measures, and long-run trends in the inter-country and global distribution of human well-being.
【24h】

Demystifying inter-country inequality: Data, measures, and long-run trends in the inter-country and global distribution of human well-being.

机译:揭开国家间不平等的神秘面纱:国家间和全球人类福祉分布的数据,测度和长期趋势。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this research I argue that past and future trends in inter-country and global inequality can be better explained and predicted by giving greater attention to key methodological and theoretical insights that span disciplinary boundaries. I propose a unifying framework for the study of inter-country inequality in non-pecuniary variables that explicitly links innovation diffusion to inequality and argues for a long-run view of world inequality trends. I suggest that the use of formal measures of inequality in the study of inequality trends for variables that are bounded or that can be expressed in complementary form (e.g. literacy and illiteracy) often violates the welfare and anonymity principles. Studies of convergence that rely on limited dependent variables are better served by the standard deviation than by conventional mean-standardized measures of inequality. To test these ideas, I collected national-level estimates of health (life expectancy at birth), fertility (crude birth rates and total fertility rates), education (primary school enrollment rates), income (GDP per capita), and population size for the majority of the world's countries and people going back to the early 1800s. Using these data, I provide long-run estimates of between-country inequality trends over most of the last two centuries. I find that the long-run inequality trends in key domains have followed a remarkably similar pattern of first rising and then falling inter-country inequality. In all three domains, inter-country inequalities were low in the early and mid 1800s, then began to rise through the early and mid 1900s. Between-country inequalities in fertility, health, and education have declined throughout much of the last half of the 20th century.
机译:在这项研究中,我认为,通过更加关注跨越学科界限的关键方法论和理论见解,可以更好地解释和预测国家间和全球不平等的过去和未来趋势。我提出了一个用于研究非金钱变量中国家间不平等的统一框架,该框架明确地将创新扩散与不平等联系起来,并提出了对世界不平等趋势的长期看法。我建议在对不平等趋势进行有界或可以互补形式表示的变量(例如识字和文盲)研究中,使用形式上的不平等形式度量方法经常会违反福利和匿名原则。依靠有限因变量进行的收敛性研究比标准的不均等的传统均值标准化度量更好地满足了标准偏差的要求。为了检验这些想法,我收集了以下国家/地区的估计值:健康(出生时的预期寿命),生育率(粗出生率和总生育率),教育(小学入学率),收入(人均GDP)和人口规模世界上大多数国家和人民都可以追溯到1800年代初期。利用这些数据,我提供了过去两个世纪大部分时间里国家间不平等趋势的长期估计。我发现,关键领域的长期不平等趋势遵循了国家间不平等先升后降的明显相似模式。在这三个领域中,国家间的不平等在1800年代初和中期都很低,然后在1900年代初和中期开始上升。在20世纪后半叶的大部分时间里,国家之间在生育,健康和教育方面的不平等现象有所减少。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dorius, Shawn F.;

  • 作者单位

    The Pennsylvania State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Pennsylvania State University.;
  • 学科 Economics General.;Sociology Demography.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 199 p.
  • 总页数 199
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:11

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号