首页> 外文学位 >Institutional change in a transitional society: Support and resistance to new academic programs at two distinct universities in Bulgaria. A case study.
【24h】

Institutional change in a transitional society: Support and resistance to new academic programs at two distinct universities in Bulgaria. A case study.

机译:过渡社会的制度变迁:保加利亚两所不同大学对新学术计划的支持和抵制。案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the early 1990s, and since then, just like institutions in any other sector, higher education institutions have been looking for models of restructuring. Best practices show that the most prestigious universities adapt by new programmatic designs. The research provides evidence to assess the proposition that The New Bulgarian University opened in 1991 as alternative to the traditional universities is better aligned with the requirements of modern times than the traditional university, Sofia University. The New Bulgarian University is an entrepreneurial liberal arts teaching and research university. It is funded by various sources but is mostly tuition-based. It can be viewed as the embodiment of new trends in institution building.; This study is an embedded, two-site case study (Yin, 1994). The embedded case study allows for grouping of the participants into main units and subunits. In this study, the two universities are the main units; the leadership and faculty groups are the main subunits; students and other stakeholders constitute other subunits. Programmatic changes are examples of institutional restructuring. The research examined decision-making as a measure of support and resistance to restructuring.; Data from 78 participants were collected over a one-year period by means of open-ended and guided interviews, different printed materials, and direct observations. Questions were guided, in part, by theories of institutional change, strategic change leadership theories and attitude change theories. Using the pattern-matching technique (Yin, 1994), data were presented as two institutional patterns of decision-making in relation to key institutional change and leadership concepts.; The study contributed further to the understanding of another aspect of the implementation of the state legislation, namely, what patterns of institutional decision-making have occurred as a result of the limitations of the law. Findings revealed that new leadership trends clearly appear at both universities, but mostly at The New Bulgarian University. The new leadership skills are the opposite of the old ones---active behavior vs. inactivity, positive attitudes vs. negative attitudes to change, risk taking vs. prolonged deliberations regarding opportunities, and overt opinions, vs. covert judgments.; In a second finding a dialectic seems to be operating in which the traditional Sofia University is under pressure to respond more effectively to the needs and demands of the global market, and The New Bulgarian University, correspondingly, is challenged to further accommodate the traditional demands of academic excellence.; The criteria for interpreting the findings support two theoretical propositions. The starting theoretical proposition was that leadership skills are key to institutional change and its implementation. Additional proposition suggests that leadership skills are necessary yet not sufficient for implementation of change.; In conclusion, universities need to accept responsibility for learning how to integrate business models with their traditional way of doing business. Recommendations suggest that university leaders and faculty need to get past the defensive stage, past the compliance stage, past the managerial stage and embrace the strategic and civil stage of responsibility.
机译:在1990年代初期,从那时起,就像其他任何部门的机构一样,高等教育机构也一直在寻找重组的模式。最佳实践表明,最负盛名的大学会采用新的程序设计来适应。这项研究提供了证据来评估这一主张,即与传统大学索非亚大学相比,新保加利亚大学于1991年作为传统大学的替代者成立,更符合现代的要求。新保加利亚大学是一所创业型的文科教学和研究型大学。它由各种来源资助,但主要以学费为基础。它可以看作是机构建设新趋势的体现。这项研究是一个嵌入式的,两点案例研究(Yin,1994年)。嵌入式案例研究可以将参与者分为主要单元和子单元。在本研究中,两所大学是主要单元。领导和教职员工是主要的子部门。学生和其他利益相关者构成其他子部门。计划变更是机构重组的例子。这项研究检查了决策,以此作为对重组的支持和抵制。通过不限成员名额和指导性访谈,不同的印刷材料和直接观察,在一年的时间内收集了来自78名参与者的数据。这些问题部分由制度变迁理论,战略变迁领导理论和态度变迁理论指导。使用模式匹配技术(Yin,1994),将数据作为与关键制度变革和领导理念相关的两种制度决策模式提出。该研究进一步促进了对国家立法实施的另一个方面的理解,即由于法律的限制而发生了何种体制决策模式。调查结果表明,两所大学显然都出现了新的领导趋势,但大部分出现在新保加利亚大学。新的领导能力与旧的相反:积极的行为与不活跃,积极的态度与消极的改变态度,冒险与对机会的长时间讨论,公开的观点与秘密的判断。在第二个发现中,辩证法似乎正在发挥作用,传统的索非亚大学正承受着压力,要求其更有效地响应全球市场的需求,相应地,新保加利亚大学也面临着挑战,以进一步适应全球化的传统需求。学术卓越。解释发现的标准支持两个理论命题。最初的理论命题是,领导技能是制度变革及其实施的关键。其他建议表明,领导才能是实现变革所必需的,但还不足以实现。总之,大学需要承担学习如何将商业模型与传统的经商方式相结合的责任。建议表明,大学领导和教职员工需要超越防御阶段,超越合规阶段,超越管理阶段,并承担责任的战略和公民阶段。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yotova, Julia Kirilova.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.; Education Administration.; Business Administration Management.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 274 p.
  • 总页数 274
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;教育;贸易经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号