首页> 外文学位 >Botanical Resource Use in the Bronze and Iron Age of the Central Eurasian Mountain/Steppe Interface: Decision Making in Multiresource Pastoral Economies.
【24h】

Botanical Resource Use in the Bronze and Iron Age of the Central Eurasian Mountain/Steppe Interface: Decision Making in Multiresource Pastoral Economies.

机译:中亚欧亚山脉/草原界面在青铜和铁器时代的植物资源利用:多资源牧场经济中的决策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines botanical resources as components of Central Asian economies in the Bronze (ca. 2500 - 800 B.C.) and Iron Ages (ca. 800 B.C. - A.D. 500) using a paleoethnobotanical data set from four archaeological sites, Begash, Mukri, Tasbas, and Tuzusai. These sites are located in the Semirech'ye region of eastern Kazakhstan, and they occupy distinctive microenvironmental zones along the mountain and steppe boundaries; furthermore, they show a great deal of material cultural similarity and are placed into the same culture groups by researchers. The introduction of macrobotanical studies to Central Asian archaeology allows for a critique of former models of economy. This dissertation is divided into three economic foci, agriculture, pastoralism, and exchange. First, I look at the role of wild plants as herd forage, specifically focusing on how resource patchiness helped shape social systems and networks. Then, I look at the role agriculture played at different sites and how this role changed over time. Finally, I discuss the role exchange played in the spread of domesticated plants and products such as textiles and grains.;Agriculture: In this dissertation, I demonstrate that domesticated grains (broomcorn millet and compact free-threshing wheat) were present in the economy of the region as far back as the Late Bronze Age (2200 cal B.C.). However, the role of these domesticates and the means of their acquisition are poorly understood. By the Late Bronze Age at the site of Tasbas (1400 cal B.C.), full-scale agriculture was being practiced; specifically cultivating semispherical split-apex naked barley, highly-compact free-threshing wheat, broomcorn millet, possibly foxtail millet, and peas.;The Iron Age transition in this region was marked by major social and demographic shifts, starting around 800 B.C. This dissertation helps to provide a direct causal link between these sociopolitical changes and the intensification of agriculture (following a Boserupian model). The inhabitants of sites such as Tuzusai, on the Talgar alluvial fan, shifted their economy more toward agricultural pursuits and away from mobile pastoralism. The incorporation of new agricultural resources, such as new varieties of wheat, hulled barley, and grapes marks this shift, which was also accompanied by possible intensification through irrigation and crop diversification. The shift toward agriculture was not uniform throughout Semirech'ye; at sites such as Begash and Mukri, economies were much more herd animal-based. Occupants of these sites may have cultivated small-scale, low-investment plots of broomcorn and foxtail millet, crops much more adaptive to a mobile pastoral economy.;Pastoralism: The pastorally-focused economy of these areas relied on forage for herd animals located in orographically determined microenvironments (ecotopes). Herd movement and foraging patterns are also discussed in this dissertation based on the seed composition of burnt dung. The wild seeds in the assemblage indicate that herds were grazed in small forage-rich ecological pockets, rather than on the steppe proper. This system of focused herd grazing is still used today. Focusing economic activities on these pockets means that, while overall population was low, it was localized in specific locations. These pockets became nodes in a network of interaction and exchange across the region, providing locations for winter communal encampment and social meeting spots.;Exchange: By the second millennium B.C. an exchange network had formed, connecting populations in South Asia to people in western China through a system of exchange, linked by mountain valleys. Goods such as metal ore, horses, and textiles were exchanged. This corridor of exchange seems to have brought agricultural technology from China southwest into South Asia and southwest Asian crops into China. By the Late Bronze Age a specific package of agricultural crops had formed across the entire mountain corridor. The increased exchange and interaction that marked the Iron Age transition eventually cumulated into the Silk Road, and it brought new crops and technology into Central Asia, ultimately leading to increased social complexity and stratification.
机译:本论文使用来自四个考古遗址(贝加什,穆克里,塔斯巴斯,和Tuzusai。这些地点位于哈萨克斯坦东部的Semirech'ye地区,沿山区和草原边界占据独特的微环境区。而且,它们表现出很大的物质文化相似性,并且被研究人员置于相同的文化群体中。将宏观植物学研究引入中亚考古学可以对以前的经济模式进行批判。本文分为农业,畜牧业和交换三个经济重点。首先,我着眼于野生植物作为牧草的作用,特别关注资源稀缺性如何帮助塑造社会系统和网络。然后,我考察了农业在不同地点所扮演的角色,以及随着时间的推移该角色如何变化。最后,我讨论了交换在驯化的植物和产品(如纺织品和谷物)的传播中所扮演的角色。农业:在本文中,我证明了驯化的谷物(b帚小米和紧凑型自由脱粒小麦)存在于该地区的历史可追溯到青铜时代晚期(公元前2200年)。但是,人们对这些驯养者的作用及其获取方式知之甚少。到塔斯巴斯遗址(公元前1400年)的青铜时代晚期,人们开始实行大规模农业。特别是种植半球形裂顶裸露的大麦,高度紧凑的自由脱粒小麦,b帚小米,可能是谷子的小米和豌豆;该地区的铁器时代的转变以公元前800年左右的主要社会和人口变化为特征。本论文有助于在这些社会政治变化与农业集约化之间建立直接的因果联系(遵循波塞鲁皮安模型)。塔加(Talgar)冲积扇上的图祖赛(Tuzusai)等地的居民,其经济更多地转向农业追求,而不是流动的畜牧业。引入新的农业资源,例如小麦,去壳的大麦和葡萄等新品种,标志着这一转变,同时还伴随着灌溉和作物多样化可能导致的集约化。在塞米勒赫伊地区,向农业的转变并不统一。在比加什(Begash)和穆克里(Mukri)等地,经济更是以畜群为基础的。这些地点的居民可能耕种了小规模,投资少的b帚和谷子,使作物更适应流动的畜牧业经济。;牧民主义:这些地区的牧业经济以牧草为食,这些畜群位于地理位置确定的微环境(同位素)。本文还根据burn粪的种子组成,探讨了牛群的运动和觅食方式。集合中的野生种子表明,放牧是在草料丰富的小型生态口袋中放牧的,而不是放在草原上。今天仍然使用这种集中放牧的系统。将经济活动集中在这些地区上意味着,尽管总人口较少,但人口分布在特定位置。这些口袋成为整个地区互动和交流网络中的节点,为冬季的公共营地和社交聚会场所提供了位置。交流:到公元前第二个千年交流网络已经形成,通过山谷之间的交流系统,将南亚的人口与中国西部的人们联系起来。交换了金属矿石,马匹和纺织品等商品。这种交流的通道似乎已将中国西南的农业技术带入了南亚,而西南亚的农作物也带入了中国。到青铜时代晚期,整个山区走廊已经形成了一套特殊的农作物。标志着铁器时代过渡的交流和互动的增加最终累积到了丝绸之路,并将新的农作物和技术带入中亚,最终导致社会复杂性和阶层的增加。

著录项

  • 作者

    Spengler, Robert N., III.;

  • 作者单位

    Washington University in St. Louis.;

  • 授予单位 Washington University in St. Louis.;
  • 学科 Biology Botany.;Anthropology Archaeology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 503 p.
  • 总页数 503
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:43

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号